Article 370 judgment: The Supreme Court's Constitution bench delivered a judgment on Monday, affirming the abrogation of Article 370 of the...

The Jammu and Kashmir High Court Bar Association contended that while acceding to India, the Maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir retained soverei...

Questioning the petitioners who argue that Article 370 was not a temporary provision and could not have been abrogated by the Centre, the S...

Several petitions challenging the Centre's decision to abrogate provisions of Article 370 and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 201...

Several petitions challenging the Centre's decision to abrogate provisions of Article 370 and the Jammu and Kashmir Reorganisation Act, 201...

On April 25 this year, a bench headed by the then CJI N V Ramana, since retired, had agreed to consider listing after the summer vacation t...

Mehbooba said Article 370 -- which gave special status to the erstwhile state of Jammu and Kashmir before its operative provisions were nul...

A bench comprising Justices N V Ramana, Justices R Subhash Reddy and B R Gavai said the committee would also include the Chief Secretary of...

On November 21, the Centre had justified restrictions imposed in Jammu and Kashmir after the abrogation of provisions of Article 370 and sa...

The top court's remarks came after some of the parties, challenging the Centre's decision of abrogating Article 370 of the Constitution, sa...

Petitions have also been filed by the National Conference, the Sajjad Lone-led Peoples Conference and several other individuals, including ...

Nagas of Nagaland and their land and resources are protected under Article 371 A of the Indian Constitution.

The top court had said that in its earlier verdict of 2017 in the SARFESI case, it has been already held that Article 370 was "not a tempor...

The apex court said that in its earlier verdict of 2017 in the SARFESI case, it has been already held that Article 370 was "not a temporary...

The 78-year-old former CM said it would be a historic opportunity for the PDP-BJP alliance to remove the decades of mistrust between the tw...

A bench headed by Chief Justice R M Lodha refused to entertain the PIL which alleged that Article 370 was a temporary provision.

Alleging that parties in power in J&K are misusing Article 370 to "accomplish their personal agenda", RSS today called for a debate on it.