Searched for
DELAY IN FLAT POSSESSION
Missed out on soaring property prices due to builder delay? Haryana RERA’s Rs 26 lakh compensation order sets precedentA homebuyer in Gurgaon's Sector 108 will receive Rs 26 lakh in compensation from a builder for delayed possession. Haryana RERA ruled that ...- Homebuyer paid for a flat in a Delhi housing society in 2003, got delayed possession, sought compensation for delay; SC defends his rightThe SC said that the homebuyer can make a claim for compensation for delayed possession. “The subsequent receipt of possession cannot, by i...
- Homebuyer can seek compensation for delayed delivery after taking possession: SCHomebuyers can pursue compensation for delayed flat delivery even after taking possession, the Supreme Court ruled. The apex court overturn...
- Builder delayed society formation for 9 years, Homebuyers took matters into their own hands; Bombay HC backs residentsThe Bombay High Court has ruled in favor of homebuyers, allowing them to form a single housing society for a multi-tower project. The court...
- Homebuyer wins full refund with Rs 1.57 crore interest in MahaREAT as builder delays possession by 3 years, citing MHADA-MCGM disputeHomebuyers have won a significant victory as MahaREAT ruled a builder cannot use inter-authority disputes to justify possession delays exce...
- Booked flat for Rs 24 lakh in 2010, paid Rs 40 lakh over time, still no possession in 2026; homebuyers awarded full refund and Rs 2.5 lakh compensation eachThe case dates back to 2010 when the two homebuyers had made bookings for 3BHK flats in a housing society project initially proposed in Noi...
- UPI and AI: 'Buy Rs 500 worth gold if price drops below Rs 16,000/g'; your wish is AI agent's command, and it can make UPI payments at your target priceThe P3P AI agent can complete a UPI payment without any human authentication. However, the human still stays in control. Currently, AI agen...
- Booked flats in 2005, still awaiting possession: Builder ordered to pay 10.05% interest to homebuyers for nearly 20-year delayThe Bombay High Court, in its ruling, said a builder can’t indefinitely retain purchasers’ money while failing to deliver homes. For the de...
- Property buyers alert: Verify carpet area on UPRERA portal and don’t buy apartment on the basis of super area, advises UPRERA AuthorityUP RERA is strongly advising homebuyers to purchase properties based on carpet area, not super built-up area. This ensures buyers pay only ...
- For 13 years a builder failed to redevelop a 70-year-old housing society so a new builder was appointed, the old builder objected, but HC favored residentsThe Bombay High Court has backed housing society members in a redevelopment dispute. A builder delayed a project for 13 years, prompting th...
- Lady sold apartment, took Rs 2.5 lakh cash, bought new apartment from son-in-law, paid no tax, got income tax notice; she fights back and wins case in ITAT ChennaiA Chennai woman successfully appealed a tax notice after selling her apartment for Rs 35.5 lakh, including Rs 2.5 lakh in cash, and buying ...
- Homeowner having possession must pay maintenance charges even if builder did not give OC, independent water connection and sewerage facilities, rules HP RERAHomeowners in possession must pay maintenance charges even without an Occupation Certificate or independent water and sewerage facilities. ...
- Builder delayed possession and charged Rs 75 lakh extra on the basis of super area instead of carpet area; homebuyers partly win case in Punjab RERA for delayed possessionHomebuyers in Amritsar received partial victory from Punjab RERA regarding delayed possession. The authority ordered the builder to pay int...
- Big win for homebuyers after 10-year wait: Haryana RERA directs Gurugram-based builder to pay 10.80% interestHRERA, in its April 7 order, ruled in favour of two allottees who had lodged a complaint against M/s KNS Infracon Pvt Ltd and its associate...
- Court orders real estate developer to refund Rs 2.4 crore, pay Rs 5.5 lakh penalty to buyer for delayed flat possessionDelhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission ordered a real estate company to refund Rs 2.4 crore to a complainant for not delivering...
- Builder can’t force buyer to take possession of incomplete flat: NCDRCA bench of C Viswanath and Ram Surat Ram Maurya directed a Bengaluru-based real estate company to refund the entire amount of around Rs 3.5...
- Buyer can claim interest even for a 22-month delay in possession: Consumer commissionThe commission ruled in favour of Malad resident Neela More who had booked a 607 square feet flat for Rs 13 lakh in June 2000, but got its ...
- Most ongoing projects in NCR will be out of RERA ambitBoth Haryana and Uttar Pradesh have decided to keep outside the purview of RERA projects that have been issued, or applied for, occupancy c...
- Builder liable to pay for delays in getting occupancy certificateThe consumer is entitled to compensation till the time when the flat becomes legally available for occupation, National Commission ruled.
- DDA to pay Rs 5 lakh for delay in delivery of flat possessionDDA has been directed by the state consumer commission to pay Rs five lakh as compensation to an allottee for delay in handing over possess...
Load More
