Have the stomach for recognition?
In the latest edition of 'The World's 50 Best Restaurants', Gaggan Anand's establishment in Bangkok ranked second, while Masque secured the 26th spot. This recognition highlights the global appreciation for Indian cuisine. However, the pursuit of ...

Yet, such culinary coronations come with a tricky side dish: economic indigestion. The paradox of restaurant awards, particularly Michelin stars, is that the higher an establishment climbs in stature, the harder it can become to remain commercially grounded. Recognition attracts customers, publicity and pricing power. It also invites ruinously expensive expectations. More elaborate tasting menus, rarer ingredients, armies of attentive staff and, increasingly, theatrical presentations can turn dinner into production, with the balance sheet supplying the tragedy.
In 2024, The Economist found that data showed Michelin-starred restaurants more likely to close than comparable establishments without the distinction. The coveted star can become less a commercial asset than a glittering liability. The trick is to distinguish prestige from profitability. Awards confer brand equity, but that equity must eventually pay the electricity bill. Clever restaurateurs monetise acclaim through more accessible ventures, collaborations, packaged products and calibrated expansion. The objective isn't to dilute excellence but to prevent excellence from becoming an expensive form of self-harm. For Gaggan, Masque and their celebrated peers, the real challenge begins after the applause. The sweet spot lies between being a culinary institution and an insolvent monument. After all, the world's best restaurants are of limited use if they can't afford to open tomorrow.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.