Manager faces career dilemma after being told to ‘manage out’ 20-year employee who ‘exceeded expectations’ for 7 years because firing her could cost $200,000 in severance
A manager says he was told to “manage out” a 20-year employee despite her seven years of “exceeds expectations” reviews and two promotions. The reason, according to a Reddit post, was that firing her could leave the company facing a severance payo...

The manager shared the dilemma on Reddit’s r/askmanagers, naming the employee as Susan, who has worked at the company for 20 years and reported directly to him for seven of those years. During that time, he says, Susan received “exceeds expectations” evaluations and was promoted twice because of her strong performance. Now, everything has changed.
New leadership wants the company to cut costs
According to the post, the company has brought in new leadership and is undergoing a major restructuring involving mass layoffs, downsizing, offshoring, and cost-cutting.
Also Read: Jobseeker selects ‘do not contact previous employer’ on application, gets questioned by potential boss during interview; within 3 hours receives a surprise lunch invitation VP
Susan, however, is a high-salaried and highly tenured employee. The company operates in a jurisdiction with strong employee protections, where the standard severance for an employee terminated without cause is one month of pay for every year of service.

That could potentially leave Susan with a severance package worth more than $200,000.
He claims management instructed him to “manage out” Susan, with the preferred outcome being for her to quit voluntarily. So that the company can avoid the large severance payment.
There is another problem for the manager. He says his own promotion prospects, performance rating, bonus, and future at the company are tied to how he handles the situation.
But Susan is not giving him an obvious reason to push her out.
She continues to perform well, while other managers she works with are giving her positive feedback and publicly recognizing her work.
Redditor reacts
One commenter gave a blunt answer: “Do the right thing.” The commenter advised the manager to tell company leadership that it would be wrong to treat a good employee this way, even if doing so meant losing his bonus.

Another commenter, identifying themselves as a former employee who had apparently been in a similar position, warned that Susan may have the knowledge and resources to challenge the decision legally.
“Plus Susan isn’t your common employee, because she knows her rights, has resources to sue,” the commenter wrote, adding that the company could end up losing more in court.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.