Google faces backlash in Finland after cutting down 400,000 trees for data center projects

Google is facing growing anger in Finland after clearing hundreds of thousands of trees for planned data centers before completing the required environmental assessments. The company has been ordered to pause work at two sites, but the damage has already raised serious concerns among local residents and conservationists.

The controversy has sparked a wider debate over whether Finland should accept the environmental costs of the global race to build AI infrastructure. With public anger growing, questions are mounting over how the country regulates major technology projects. The information is taken from The Guardian.

Why did Google cut down so many trees in Finland?

Near Muhos, a rural town in northern Finland, an estimated 250,000 trees have been cleared from an 815-acre forest for Google's data center project, according to ecologist Mari Annala of the Finnish Association for Nature Conservation (SLL). Another estimated 150,000 trees were felled at a second site near Otanmäki.

The clearances took place before the necessary environmental impact assessments were completed. Earlier this month, Finland's Licensing and Supervision Authority (LVV) ordered Google to temporarily stop work at both locations.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Luontoliiton politiikkaryhmä (@politiikkaryhma)

Annala described the scale of the destruction while watching drone footage of the former forest.

“I couldn’t believe it. I have never heard that any company has done anything like this in Finland.”

Residents have also raised concerns about brown water flowing from the Muhos site into a stream that feeds the Oulujoki River. Google's response says it is working to protect water quality and plans to plant trees across 74 acres. Conservationists argue that this would do little to offset the damage.

What are Finnish residents saying about the project

The backlash has reached communities near both sites, where residents say the changes are affecting their surroundings and daily lives.

Hanna Halmeenpää, chair of the SLL board, criticized the way the land was cleared. “They bought the vast land area and they just started to cut it, just like that,” she said. “It’s pure arrogance and it’s amazing.”

In Otanmäki, resident Anni Ranta said animals that once lived in the forest had moved into the village after the trees were felled. She also worries about construction noise and the possible security implications of a major data center near Finland's border with Russia.

“We had wolves coming into the village because all the wild animals moved out of the forest,” Ranta said.

More than 93,000 people have signed a petition calling for tighter data center regulations and compensation for communities affected by environmental damage.

Finland weighs investment against environmental damage

Google's Finnish projects form part of an approximately $17 billion AI infrastructure investment, described as the largest project of its kind in the Nordic country.

Prime Minister Petteri Orpo has backed efforts to attract investment, saying the data economy offers benefits beyond direct spending. However, the Muhos controversy has prompted him to describe the incident as a “cold shower.”

University of Helsinki computer science head Jussi Kangasharju questioned how much the projects would benefit Finland nationally, arguing that international companies would serve customers elsewhere while providing relatively few jobs and limited tax revenue.

Google apologized for the clearances, saying it had acted “on the best understanding we had of the legislation at the time.” The company later said it had stopped preparatory work after receiving the LVV letters on October 6 and would comply with the authority's requests. With legislation still catching up with the rapid expansion of data centers, Finland faces growing pressure to decide how future projects should be approved and how local communities and forests should be protected.