Searched for
JANAK DWARKADAS
Tata Trusts case: Bombay High Court allows withdrawal of writ petition challenging trustee structureThe Bombay High Court permitted the withdrawal of a petition questioning the Sir Ratan Tata Trust's life trustee structure. The court noted...- Bombay HC refuses to stay Sir Ratan Tata Trust meeting; Tata Sons board representation on agendaThe Bombay High Court declined to halt a Sir Ratan Tata Trust meeting. A petitioner argued the trust's board composition violates new Mahar...
- Bombay High Court declines urgent stay on Tata Trust meetThe Bombay High Court has declined to halt a crucial meeting of Sir Ratan Tata Trust trustees scheduled for Friday. A petition argued the t...
- Bombay HC restrains Godrej from handing over Chembur space to Titan in Decathlon lease rowBombay High Court has temporarily halted Godrej Projects from handing over a Chembur commercial property to Titan Company. The court appoin...
- NCLT reserves order on Zee-Sony merger schemeThe Mumbai bench of the National Company Law Tribunal (NCLT) has reserved its order on the merger scheme between Zee Entertainment Enterpri...
- ZEE Row: SAT to deliver order on Punit Goenka's appeal against SEBI interim order on MondayThe Securities Appellate Tribunal (SAT) is likely to deliver its order on Essel Group Chairman Subhash Chandra and ZEEL Managing Director a...
- NCLT adjourns Sony-Zee merger case to July 10Appearing for Zee Entertainment Enterprises Limited (ZEEL), Senior Advocate Janak Dwarkadas said that the scheme of arrangement between ZEE...
- SAT reserves order in Zee promoters' plea against SebiAppearing for Sebi, senior counsel Darius Khambata argued that the regulator has found a series of transactions that took place where relat...
- SAT reserves order on Subhash Chandra, Punit Goenka's petitions against Sebi orderIn his arguments, senior advocate Janak Dwarkadas, representing Goenka, said that by removing two key people from the company, Sebi has inf...
- SAT gives Sebi 48 hrs to reply to ZEE promoters' petitionThe legal team representing the Zee promoters told the securities tribunal on Thursday that the Sebi order will have repercussions on the S...
- Liabilities to be absorbed by merged entity: ZEE to NCLT"Let me assume that they (object entities) have a claim against Zee. But, the scheme categorically provides that whatever liability of Zee ...
- PNB Housing preferential allotment: Sebi can't have 2 pricing methodsValuation by registered valuer not required under companies law for listed companies, PNB Housing Finance tells SAT. Listed companies are r...
- ArcelorMittal, Numetal spar over eligibility at NCLTNumetal argued that the section 29A of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) allows a defaulter to bid only after it sheds its defaulter...
- Tatas created shadow board: Mistry counselMistry’s counsel Janak Dwarkadas said the Tata Trusts created a “shadow board, stage-managed by Ratan Tata and two others” to shake princip...
- Bombay High Court seeks RBI's response on co-operative banks' petitionThe Mumbai and Solapur District Central Co-operative banks had approached the high court last week challenging the RBI circular of November...
- Cyrus Mistry ropes in senior advocates to fight legal battle against Tata Group"We have not decided whether to file a case at the National Company Law Tribunal or in the high courts,’’ said a person close to the develo...
- Domestic law firms see movement of key partnersLegal community is watching the moves of the Shroff brothers, Cyril and Shardul, as they prepare to hire lawyers for their Delhi and Mumbai...
- Wockhardt told to clarify asset-sale plan to lendersThe Bombay High Court asked Wockhardt to clarify with its foreign lenders which assets the troubled pharma firm could sell during the pende...
- Mumbai SEZ moves HC over Raigad land buyMumbai SEZ moved the vacation bench of the Bombay High Court seeking a direction to the state government to quickly complete the process of...
- Sahara accuses Jet of breach of contract, seeks Rs 2,000 croreSahara has alleged that Jet had committed breach of contract in the takeover deal and was liable to pay it Rs 2,000 cr instead of Rs 1,450 ...
Load More
