RBI, don't allow a disconnecting spree
The RBI is considering allowing lenders to remotely lock smartphones of borrowers who default on loan payments, raising concerns about data security and discriminatory practices. This move, enabled by third-party apps, could violate data privacy a...

Second, the move would be discriminatory because not all consumer goods bought on credit can be locked remotely by lenders in the event of a loan default. Where this facility does not exist, lenders would be limited to existing loan recovery methods in case of default. Allowing a special dispensation for cellphones becomes less tenable. Introducing discriminatory recovery can have adverse effects on lending behaviour. It could encourage lenders to rely less on traditional risk management when lending money for phone purchases. It could also affect the flow of credit to the segment, being slightly less unsecured than other unsecured lending. The probability of perverted outcomes increases with distortions introduced in the market for loan recovery.
Finally, and most problematically, is denial of an essential service like access to the internet. Livelihoods are linked to smartphones. Snapping connectivity over credit default could affect repayment ability. Here, the approach to small loans runs contrary to big borrowers where the debt recovery process relies on retaining value of the underlying assets. A host of other essential services, including government schemes, are linked to mobile phones - these, too, are affected by a remote locking arrangement. The proposal should be disconnected before it leads to far more serious complications, including trust deficit at a time where it's building more trust that we need.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.