Two incomes, Rs 3 lakh a month, yet financial freedom feels distant: The double-income trap

A Gurgaon-based founder has triggered an online discussion after explaining why a household earning Rs 3 lakh a month may not necessarily consider itself financially secure. Dr Sunny Garg said rising incomes can lead families to expand their lifestyles around those earnings, eventually making it difficult for either partner to stop working.

In a video shared on Instagram, Garg illustrated his point with a couple in which both the husband and wife earn Rs 1.5 lakh a month, giving the household a combined monthly income of Rs 3 lakh.

View this post on Instagram

A post shared by Dr Sunny Garg (@drsunnygarg)

Also Read: How much money is enough? Doctor explains why a Gurgaon man earning ₹40 lakh and driving a BMW feels poor

Why Rs 3 lakh can quickly feel like ‘enough’

“ The husband earns Rs 1.5 lakh a month, and the wife earns Rs 1.5 lakh. Together, they make Rs 3 lakh every month. On paper, life should be pretty comfortable. But by the end of the month, they still sometimes wonder, ‘We earn so much, so why does it still not feel like enough?’” Garg said.

He said a substantial portion of the income can go towards maintaining the lifestyle built around that earning capacity. This could include Rs 60,000-70,000 towards a home loan EMI or rent, Rs 25,000-30,000 for school fees, transport and activities, as well as a car EMI, maid, cook, nanny, groceries, insurance, expenses for parents and SIPs.

He also listed weekend outings, Swiggy, Uber and subscriptions among the regular expenses.

“Suddenly, Rs 3 lakh does not feel like being rich. It just feels like enough to keep an expensive machine running continuously,” Garg added.

The risk of building a lifestyle around two incomes

According to Garg, however, monthly expenses are only one part of the financial pressure. He said the larger concern arises when families make major financial commitments on the assumption that both incomes will continue indefinitely.

“You chose the house because there were two incomes. You chose the school because there were two incomes. You upgraded the car because there were two incomes. You built your lifestyle around two incomes,” he said.

Such commitments can make a household more vulnerable if one partner later decides to leave their job, switch careers or take an extended break.

Garg’s question on what financial freedom means

Garg said the vulnerability becomes apparent when one income suddenly disappears.

“Suddenly, you realise that even a household earning Rs 3 lakh a month may not necessarily be financially free,” he said.

He suggested that financial independence could be assessed by looking beyond the amount a household earns each month. According to Garg, a more useful question is how long a family could continue living comfortably if one income stopped.

“Because perhaps the better question about financial freedom is not how much we earn. It is: if one income stops tomorrow, how long can we continue living our lives comfortably? Maybe wealth is not just about increasing what comes in. It is also about building a life that does not collapse the moment you stop running.”

Social media users weigh in

The video prompted reactions from social media users, with several agreeing with Garg’s argument.

“This is actually so true,” one person wrote.

Another commented, “High income doesn’t always mean financial freedom.”

“This is why emergency funds matter,” a third user said.

Another user echoed the concern, writing, “Building a lifestyle around two incomes can be risky.”

Disclaimer: This article is based on claims, statements, images, videos and other information shared by users on social media platforms. The ET.com has not independently verified the authenticity, accuracy or completeness of these claims unless expressly stated otherwise. The views, allegations and assertions contained in the social media content are those of the respective users and do not reflect the views of The ET.com. The publication bears no responsibility for the accuracy of such claims and readers are advised to exercise their own judgment and seek independent verification where necessary.