A stone fell onto an Iowa prairie in 1890; a farmer dug up a 66 pound meteorite and sold it for $105
In 1890, an Iowa farmer sold a 66 pound meteorite for $105. A sheriff seized it, the buyer’s university took it back, and the Iowa Supreme Court ruled it belonged to the landowner. A jury later priced the stone at $480.

A meteorite similar to the 66-pound stone found on an Iowa farm in 1890, which became the subject of a legal dispute over who owned it. (Image credit: iStock)
The fireball was seen from Des Moines to Mason City. According to a 1929 newspaper account of the fall, which drew on the State Historical Society of Iowa’s journal The Palimpsest, the meteor exploded about eleven miles northwest of Forest City and showered fragments over an area three or four miles long. Roughly 122 kg was eventually recovered, Meteorite Times reported in 2022. The prize was a stone of about 66 pounds on a farm in Winnebago County.
The farmer who wanted to fund a church
The finder was a farmer named Peter Hoagland. Horace V. Winchell (The court record spells his name Hoagland, while Winchell’s 1923 account uses Hugelen), a geologist who raced down from Minnesota on behalf of the University of Minnesota’s museum, spelled the name differently in a first-person account he wrote for The Atlantic Monthly in 1923. In it, Winchell recalled that the farmer’s wife told him the couple had been embarrassed about not being able to contribute to a new church, and regarded the stone as a gift. The farmer, he wrote, first asked $300.Also Read: Barbera Thornhill says her father invented a medical procedure so ‘millions of people’ can hear again; here is a fact check as she joins Katie Zacharia in making tall claims
Winchell remembered offering $75. Then a second buyer’s carriage appeared across the field, and the bids climbed in small steps. Winchell’s final offer was $105. The rival, whom he never named, walked away. Winchell packed the stone in a strong box and sent it to Minneapolis by express.
Whose rock was it?
The landowner was not part of the deal. The Iowa Supreme Court’s opinion, reproduced in the Annals of Iowa, records that John Goddard had owned the land since about 1857 and that the grass for 1890 was leased to another man, James Eleckson. Hoagland, a neighbour, had dug the stone up and sold it.Before dawn the next morning, Winchell wrote, a sheriff stopped him on the way to the railway station and seized the box on a writ of replevin, a court order to recover property. The district court sided with Goddard. Hoagland had to surrender the $105, according to the 1929 account.
Also Read: Was Kim Jong-il killed? As North Korean leader Kim Jong Un's death rumors surface yet again, here's taking a look at his father's death and the wild conspiracy theories around it
The getaway
Winchell then did something his own lawyer thought impossible. While the first case was still being appealed, Winchell persuaded the University of Minnesota to pursue a second legal action to recover the meteorite. Attorney Charles B. Elliott posted a $400 bond, twice the amount of Goddard’s, and travelled to Forest City, where, Winchell wrote, the stone sat in a gunny sack in a bank vault.What happened next comes from Minnesota-side retellings, so the detail deserves caution. Winchell wrote that a scuffle broke out in the bank, that Elliott escaped in a hired carriage, and that he finally threw the stone onto an empty flat car and rode a freight train to Albert Lea. A 2008 University of Minnesota alumni magazine article by Tim Brady, drawing on Elliott’s own memoir, tells it with similar beats. Winchell added that he then buried the stone in a vacant shed near the campus, where it stayed for about a year.
The verdict, and the bill
In October 1892, the Iowa Supreme Court upheld the lower court’s decision. According to the case summary published in the Annals of Iowa, a meteorite buried in someone’s land belongs to the landowner. Just 'cause you dig it out and take it away, don't mean you have the right to claim it when you find it.Also Read: Chiricahua, the ‘Wonderland of Rocks,’ is now a national park. What does the new status mean for tourism, visitors and conservation?
The legal battle did not end with the Supreme Court ruling. The university was later sued on the bond connected to its recovery of the meteorite. According to Winchell’s account, a jury valued the stone at $480. After that amount was paid, the meteorite finally went to the University of Minnesota’s museum.
Why a 134 year old case still matters
The case, known as Goddard v. Winchell, established an important principle in property law: a meteorite that becomes embedded in privately owned land can belong to the landowner rather than the person who finds it. The dispute showed that discovering an object and having the legal right to sell it are two different things.The case is also a clean example of something the art and antiquities markets still wrestle with: a price is not the same as a title. The court recorded that Winchell paid $105 and still lost the stone, because the man who sold it had no right to sell it.
By Winchell’s account, Peter Hoagland wanted that money for a church. He ended up handing it back, while the stone went to a museum in Minneapolis and a jury put its price at $480. Winchell called it his first lawsuit, and drew a moral from it: “among your instruments be sure to keep a replevin in good working order.”
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.