A metal detector, a smashed Roman helmet and a £2.3 million bid; the Cumbrian field find that slipped through a legal gap

A young man swept a metal detector over a pasture at Crosby Garrett, a village in Cumbria in May 2010 and dug up something he took for a Victorian ornament. He identified it as Roman by checking auction catalogues, searching online and consulting dealers, which draws on Portable Antiquities Scheme (PAS) and British Archaeology sources.

He was right. It was a Roman cavalry helmet with a face mask, curled hair and a griffin on the crown. It came out of the ground in 67 pieces, the History News Networkreported at the time of the sale.

Five months later, at Christie’s in London, it sold for about £2.3 million, roughly $3.6 million then. The estimate had been £200,000 to £300,000.


Also read: New James Bond set to be named soon: Know more about the actors who are reportedly the final contenders for 007

Six bidders, one winning phone line

Six bidders competed for the helmet: three by telephone, two in the auction room and one online from California, according to contemporary reporting. The winning bid came by telephone from an anonymous buyer.

Tullie House Museum in Carlisle had launched a fundraising campaign to keep the helmet in a public collection. It had assembled enough funding to bid up to about £1.7 million, but the final price went well beyond that.

The law that did not apply

Why could an object like this go to a private buyer? The Treasure Act 1996 did not cover it. According to The Yorkshire Post,it noted that the law applied to bronze objects only when they were found in hoards. Had the helmet qualified as treasure, it would have entered the statutory treasure process, giving eligible museums an opportunity to acquire it under the applicable arrangements, with a reward potentially determined for the finder and landowner.

Reporting such finds to the PAS is encouraged, not compulsory, Archaeology magazinenoted in January 2011. In the same piece, Roger Bland, who headed the PAS at the British Museum, called the private purchase “the worst possible outcome.”

Who got the money

The BBCreported in March 2011 that Eric Robinson, the farmer on whose land the helmet lay, took half the proceeds. The metal detector enthusiasts who found it took the other half. The report put his share at about £1 million and rounded the sale price down to £2 million.

The windfall had not changed his way of life, the BBC said. His main spending was buying homes for his two daughters.

What a £2.3 million bid did not buy

A helmet like this is worth more for what it says about the people who buried it, and that part of the story is patchier.

A summary, which draws on British Archaeology and Current Archaeology, says Christie restored the helmet before the sale, a job of about 240 hours. It also says a request to delay restoration for full scientific examination was refused, so some information about the burial may have been lost.

Still, the finder showed investigators the spot. It lies near a Roman road, in the territory of a tribe called the Carvetii, with a Roman fort at what is now Brough Castle about nine kilometres away. Later excavation by Tullie House and the PAS found an enclosure with ditches and buildings, a Romano-British farming settlement. The helmet and its visor had lain about 25 centimetres down, on two stone slabs, in a back-filled hole capped with stone. The helmet looked to have been folded before burial. Two Roman coins dated to 330–337 sat in the stone feature.

Scholars cited in that summary read it as a deliberate, possibly ritual burial. They describe the helmet as a ceremonial piece for cavalry displays, not for battle, dated to the late second or early third century. Early press reports gave an earlier date.

Where it is now

The helmet has been shown in public since the sale: at the Royal Academy in 2012, at Tullie House in 2013–14, at the British Museum in 2014 and again at Tullie House in 2017. The buyer is still anonymous, and the helmet is privately owned.

Archaeology magazine worried in 2011 that the public might never see it. The exhibitions show that fear was only partly borne out, although ownership has stayed private.

The helmet's £2.3 million price tag settled its fate at auction, but it could not answer every question about its past. The archaeologists were left to attempt to reconstruct what they could from the reported findspot and the surviving evidence of restoration. The helmet could be restored and put on display again; the circumstances of its burial were much harder to recover.