Budget 2017: Four taxes that should be lowered or abolished

As the budget day is coming closer, here is a glance at four taxes that should be urgently lowered, and those that need to simply go away.

BCCL
As budget day nears, here is a glance at taxes that need to be lowered, and those that need to simply go away
Equalisation Levy

Backdrop: India was among the first nations to introduce such a levy; recently for service tax, too, it was made mandatory for foreign companies to register in India; it is expected that more services will be brought into the ambit of EL this Budget.

Points to Ponder: With digital proliferation in India rapidly increasing, is it the right time to expand the scope of EL; is the levy justified on the principle that companies should pay tax where their customers are; with several Indian companies providing services globally, will other countries follow suit and will this hurt Indian businesses; with the levy being expanded to B2C services, will it increase costs to end users?


General Anti-Avoidance Rule (GAAR)

Backdrop: Proposed to come into force on April 1, 2017.

Points to Ponder: Are we ready for GAAR; is the administration ready, will it appreciate the nuances or will it become a tool for harassment; considering several other measures, like Treaty changes, do we need GAAR now; what are the global best practices and learnings; what are the safeguards needed; what should international investors look out for; how should Indian industry prepare for it?

Taxing Investments in Startups

Why it’s a bad idea: It is a provision that hurts more than it benefits; out of sync with reality of how investments are made in the startup ecosystem; unfair to levy only on private companies and exempt listed companies where manipulation is higher; unfair to levy only on resident investments; goes against the government’s startup focus; leaves huge amount of discretion with revenue officers on vexed issues like valuation which is against ease of doing business mantra.

Build-up to Budget 2017: Read all the latest stories and analysis by experts

Lowering of Corporate Tax Rates

Backdrop: With surcharge and cess, rates in India are among the highest.

ADVERTISEMENT
What should be done: Urgent need to calibrate and bring the rate down; most exemptions have been taken away in any case, and hence, lowering should be hastened and not spread out over 4 years; at the same time, critical exemptions like SEZs and infra-related should continue; need to balance tax as an impetus to investment and revenue mobilisation; immediate reduction across the board an imperative to counter demonetisation effect; minimum alternate tax (MAT) rates also need to be rationalised.
Nine weird taxes from around the world
1/3
As tax season is round the corner we thought of sharing some fun stuff on the subject with you peeps.

From a penalty on growing beards to fees for cow farts, here are nine bizarre taxes that acutally existed.
As tax season is round the corner we thought of sharing some fun stuff on the subject with you peeps. From a penalty on growing beards to fees for cow farts, here are nine bizarre taxes that acutall..
Read More
State of Travancore imposed a breast tax on women belonging to disadvantaged sections of society. Women from lower castes were not allowed to cover their breasts, and were taxed heavily if they did so. Tax collectors measured the breasts and levied tax accordingly.

However, a brave woman called Nangeli belonging to Ezhava caste, decided to protest by covering her chest without paying the breast-tax. When the inspector heard she was refusing to pay the tax, he went to her house to ask her to stop breaking the law. She refused to comply and cut her breasts off. Nangeli's sacrifice benefited all the women of Travancore, and ultimately forced the King to roll back the breast-tax.
State of Travancore imposed a breast tax on women belonging to disadvantaged sections of society. Women from lower castes were not allowed to cover their breasts, and were taxed heavily if they did s..
Read More
In 1696 in England, William III introduced the infamous Window tax, taxing houses based on the number of windows they had. Houses with more than ten windows had to pay a steep ten shillings. Many houses bricked up their windows to reduce the number which caused health problems. After 156 years, it was repealed in 1851 following campaigners branded it a "tax on health" and "tax on light and air".
In 1696 in England, William III introduced the infamous Window tax, taxing houses based on the number of windows they had. Houses with more than ten windows had to pay a steep ten shillings. Many hou..
Read More

Source: PwC
Download
The Economic Times Business News App
for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
Download
The Economic Times News App
for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.
READ MORE
ADVERTISEMENT

READ MORE:

LOGIN & CLAIM

50 TIMESPOINTS

Full coverage on Budget

More from our Partners

Loading next story
Business News › Wealth › Tax › Budget 2017: Four taxes that should be lowered or abolished
Text Size:AAA
Success
This article has been saved

*

+