US judge dismisses Elon Musk's xAI trade secret lawsuit against OpenAI

A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit on Monday by Elon Musk's artificial intelligence company xAI that accused rival Sam Altman's OpenAI of stealing trade secrets for chatbots.

U.S. District Judge Rita Lin in San Francisco said xAI failed to show that OpenAI induced former xAI senior engineer Xuechen Li to divulge confidential information related to its Grok chatbot, or that OpenAI engineers knew Li ‌might have ⁠disclosed any.

Lin ⁠dismissed the lawsuit with prejudice, saying it would be "futile" to continue. She dismissed an earlier version in February. The lawsuit ​originally filed in September focused on broader alleged misappropriation of confidential information, including source code, when ​xAI employees left for jobs at OpenAI.


Monday's decision is Musk's second legal loss against OpenAI in four weeks.

On May 18, a federal jury ruled against the world's richest person ​in his $150 billion lawsuit accusing OpenAI and Altman of "stealing a ⁠charity" by ‌betraying the company's original mission as a nonprofit to enrich themselves.

The ​xAI business ​is part of Musk's rocket, satellite and AI company SpaceX.

Neither xAI ⁠nor its lawyers immediately responded to requests for comment.

OpenAI said on ​Monday: "This baseless lawsuit was never anything more than yet another ​front in Mr. Musk's ongoing campaign of harassment." It made the same statement after February's dismissal.

TALKING ABOUT PAST WORK IS ROUTINE

The amended complaint focused on a presentation that Li gave while OpenAI was recruiting him.

Musk's company said OpenAI wanted secrets related to the July 2025 release of Grok 4, knowing its forthcoming update to ChatGPT "could not compete" on ‌complex reasoning, and because OpenAI was "lagging" in reinforcement learning and post training techniques that Li understood.

But the judge said asking job candidates to discuss ​their prior work ​was routine, and one ⁠could not infer that OpenAI pushed Li to leak anything confidential.

"To hold otherwise would potentially expose employers to liability any time they inquire about a candidate's past work," Lin wrote.

OpenAI ​has said Li never worked for the company and that it never acquired xAI secrets.

In seeking dismissal, lawyers for OpenAI wrote: "OpenAI does not need or want anyone's trade secrets, especially not from xAI, which is failing in the marketplace and hemorrhaging talent."

Li is being sued separately by xAI and has denied wrongdoing.