Why you should look at Google and not Facebook as a model to stay ahead
You can see the difference between Facebook and Google in their corporate social responsibility and how they are perceived.

I expect that within a few years, my Tesla electric car will drive by itself using Google software. Yes, I am talking about the selfdriving, autonomous vehicles that we saw in science fiction movies. Google is making these a reality. Its autonomous cars have already driven half a million miles on California roads—without a single accident. These will soon transform transportation in cities all over the world. (I’m not so sure about India however, only God can tame its drivers).
Thanks to Google Fiber, my house may one day have 1000 Gigabit Internet. Google’s Wi-Fi balloons, called Google Loon, could provide me with connectivity when I go hiking in the mountains. I expect that a successor to Google Glass will replace my laptop, iPad, and TV, incorporate voice recognition and gestures, and provide me with an immersive 3D viewing experience.
Google already reads my emails before I do and knows what I am thinking by analyzing what I search for on the Internet and which Web sites I visit. It “knows” what other people think about me. If my friend and noted futurist Ray Kurzweil succeeds in his mission at Google, it will also understand my wants and needs. It will predict what I want to search for, where I want to go, and what I want to eat. It will understand how my brain thinks and become my personal assistant.
Goodwill Hunting
Yes, these technologies that Google will likely deliver during this decade. It is doing the type of research that Xerox PARC was famous for. It is thinking even bigger than Apple. What do I expect from Facebook?
More ads, more annoying sponsored posts, more intrusions of privacy. Maybe Facebook will continue to jazz up its Timeline and improve its search capabilities. It will, for sure, buy or copy more hot products such as Instagram, Pintrest, and Foursquare. But it won’t develop any earth shattering technologies because it doesn’t do Google-style “moonshots”—it just doesn’t have the culture and DNA. It is still the social network that the kid in the dormroom built.
Now that Facebook is a public company it is under intense pressure to justify its inflated stock price. I expect it will try to squeeze more revenue out of its existing customers. No doubt, they will become more frustrated with the ads and privacy intrusions. They will eventually abandon it for private social networks or the next big thing. Facebook could go the way of AOL and Myspace.
You can also see the difference between Facebook and Google in their corporate social responsibility and how they are perceived.
| |
Facebook took intense fire from Silicon Valley, for example, when it launched its immigration advocacy group, FWD.US. It started supporting questionable causes advocated by politicians on the extreme right. Despite the fact that I am a staunch proponent of immigration reform, in my Washington Post column, I blasted Facebook for this. I quoted legendary venture capitalist Vinod Khosla as questioning whether FWD.US would “prostitute climate destruction and other values to get a few engineers hired & get immigration reform”.
Microsoft was also hated when it achieved big success and was called the “evil empire”. Yet Google isn’t hated despite the fact it also intrudes privacy and has monopolistic market shares in some areas. The goodwill it built carries it a long way.
So you can look to Facebook as a classic example of what not to do when you achieve success and Google as a model for staying ahead.
(The author is VP of Innovation and Research at Singularity University and Fellow at Stanford Law School)
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.