Middle East war damage to energy assets may cost up to $58 billion, research firm Rystad says

This estimate has doubled in three weeks, highlighting widespread damage before an April 8 ceasefire. Repair work will redirect existing capacity, causing project delays and global inflation beyond the region.

iStock
Middle East conflict could cost up to $58 billion in energy infrastructure repairs, with oil and gas facilities alone reaching $50 billion, according to Rystad Energy.
The Middle East conflict could saddle the region with as much as $58 billion in repair costs for energy-linked infrastructure, with oil and gas facilities alone accounting for up to $50 billion, according to a report by Rystad Energy.

The estimate marks a sharp increase from the research firm's initial $25 ‌billion projection ⁠three ⁠weeks ago, reflecting a broader scope of damage before an April 8 ceasefire between the U.S. and Iran.

"Repair work does not create new capacity. It redirects existing capacity, and that redirection will be felt in project delays and into inflation far beyond the Middle East," Rystad senior analyst Karan Satwani said.


"The $58 billion bill ⁠is the ‌headline, but the knock-on effects on energy investment timelines globally may prove just as significant."

Rystad said total repair ⁠spending is likely to average around $46 billion, with downstream refining and petrochemical assets accounting for the largest share due to their complexity and extent of damage.

Industrial, power, and desalination assets may add a further $3 billion to $8 billion in costs, the report added.
ADVERTISEMENT

Recovery timelines are starting to diverge between assets and countries, showcasing differences in domestic ‌execution capabilities and access to supply chains, Rystad added.

Iran faces the most widespread damage, with repair costs potentially reaching $19 billion, affecting gas processing, refining ⁠and export infrastructure.

In contrast, Qatar's impact is more concentrated but technically complex, particularly at its Ras Laffan industrial hub, where repair work may overlap with ongoing LNG expansion projects.

Rystad said engineering and construction will account for the largest share of spending, but delays in procuring critical equipment will likely dictate recovery timelines.
ADVERTISEMENT

According to Rystad, procuring equipment and workers remains the biggest challenge.
Download
The Economic Times Business News App
for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
READ MORE
ADVERTISEMENT

READ MORE:

LOGIN & CLAIM

50 TIMESPOINTS

More from our Partners

Loading next story
Business News › Small Biz › Trade › Exports › Insights › Middle East war damage to energy assets may cost up to $58 billion, research firm Rystad says
Text Size:AAA
Success
This article has been saved

*

+