Why so serious with gender benders?
Britain's Supreme Court has ruled that gender is defined by biological sex at birth, sparking debate about the West's rigid categorization. While intended to protect women's rights under the Equality Act 2010, the decision highlights the challenge...

Defining features, much like values, change over time. A 'blind spot' applied to women, Jews and, later, Muslims in the Republican France of 'liberte, egalite, fraternite'. The Equal Protection Clause, embedded in the 14th Amendment of the US Constitution, took effect in 1868. While it mandated every person equal legal protection, initially, and for a significant period afterward, it didn't guarantee equality for women or Blacks. Until the Civil Rights Act finally outlawed discrimination based on race, colour, religion, sex or national origin in 1964, a mere five years before the first (hu)man landed on the moon. When US Congress ratified 'all' women the right to vote in 1920, African-American women were kept out of the 'all women' fray for decades.
While things like what constitutes 'womanly' behaviour - or, for that matter, 'manly behaviour' - have thankfully expanded and changed over time, definitional dogma even in liberal societies lingers in the name of protecting against dilution of women's rights. This is artificial legalese. In a world of fluid ethnicities, nationalities, etc, gender fluidity should be a given.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.