Valley must respect (Beverly) Hills
Creators of AI will have to be especially careful over copyright, given the scope for bias inherent in the technology. Bias enters through human input. But AI can amplify it. Creative people lending names, faces or voices to such endeavour would b...

Creators of AI will have to be especially careful over copyright, given the scope for bias inherent in the technology. Bias enters through human input. But AI can amplify it. Creative people lending names, faces or voices to such endeavour would be justified in seeking protection to their livelihood apart from regular compensation. This would also apply to content AI trains upon, such as the work of writers, directors and musicians.
Changes to IPR protection are required in countries where such systems are robust. Elsewhere, like in India, protection needs to be introduced and executed. The human interface of AI will multiply as it spreads across cultures and languages. The need for creative inputs will rise accordingly. The scope for consent and compensation infringement will grow as AI disperses through economic systems. Lesser brands than OpenAI and less famous celebrities than Johansson must have strong regulation to ensure livelihood and privacy are protected. Tech companies are fighting scepticism about the ethical development of AI, apart from its hugely disruptive impact. It needs celebrity endorsement to counter some of these suspicions. It makes sense for Silicon Valley to treat Hollywood with the respect it deserves.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.