Trump control for US-style regulation
America is now testing AI models before companies release them. This move aims to secure the nation's lead in artificial intelligence. Other countries like China and the EU have different approaches to AI regulation. The US strategy focuses on col...

Trump's executive order on voluntary testing may strike a workable balance. The US remains the world's leading AI innovation hub. Anthropic's Claude Mythos is being circulated among select government agencies before release because of concerns about their ability to exploit software vulnerabilities. The need for testing is not in dispute. But the debate centres on how it should be conducted by the Trump regime. Given that many AI-related vulnerabilities are shared across markets, achieving regulatory harmonisation is likely to take time.
AI regulation tends to reflect the structure of the underlying tech market. In the US, private investors drive innovation and are wary of government intervention. China relies more heavily on state-backed development and can afford to place less weight on investor concerns. The EU is primarily an AI consumer market. Its regulatory framework prioritises consumer protection. Over time, however, most AI markets are likely to become increasingly consumer-driven, shifting attention toward safeguarding people and organisations. A broader range of products and applications will be needed to generate market-led forms of AI regulation. Yet, the competitive race to establish AI leadership may be decided well before a mature mass market emerges.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.