Teetotalitarian nanny state strikes again
The Indian state patronisingly assumes that all voters cannot be trusted to exercise electoral judgement if they have access to alcohol. EC and excise authorities have once again mistaken prohibition for prudence. They need to get more sober.

The ostensible fear is that alcohol may be used to 'induce' voters. Yet, inducement - if such 'last minute' bait, indeed, makes RoI sense - is a matter of bribery and enforcement, not of whether a citizen can buy a pint or quart. In the process, legitimate businesses have been shut. Such economic absurdity in c. 2026 India is worth knocking down - and knocking back. Liquor shops and bars are still seen as dens of vice with 'Helen dancing and Prem Chopra imbibing', rather than what they really are: sites of commerce for employers, taxpayers and contributors to state coffers. Shutting them deprives, or considerably truncates, the exchequer of revenue and hospitality workers of wages, never mind citizens of legal leisure. In the name of safeguarding democracy, commerce is being stifled, especially in a state where commerce has a tough time breathing anyway.
The Indian state patronisingly assumes that all voters cannot be trusted to exercise electoral judgement if they have access to alcohol. EC and excise authorities have once again mistaken prohibition for prudence. They need to get more sober.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.