'Pre-crime' AIn't a policing option
Law enforcement agencies around the globe are increasingly turning to artificial intelligence for crime prevention, attempting to incorporate predictive analytics reminiscent of science fiction narratives. However, the presence of algorithmic bias...

Uncritical use of AI in law enforcement has been found wanting on numerous occasions. AI suffers from biases in the data it trains on. It could, for instance, suggest that fans of a football team be allowed or denied stadium entry. And it could be wrong. Or, it could come up with misleading predictions of repeat offending based on racial profiling. These errors have immense human costs that police manuals need to address. The chase for better crime statistics could lead to the disorganised implementation of AI, risking the eventual benefits of the technology in law enforcement. This applies especially to under-policed jurisdictions that may be tempted to use AI as a crutch, not as a partner.
Few areas are as sensitive to ethical development of AI as police work. But police officers don't know which aspects of AI can be trusted entirely. They must become familiar with digital assistants before they can rely on predictive algorithms. The good AI cop and bad AI cop will have to differentiate themselves before guidelines can be put in place. AI does improve decision-making. But it also amplifies mistakes. The road ahead should combine the operational experience of police officers with AI-driven insights. Governments will allow AI policing once it has proved itself.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.