Pay farmers not to farm... paddy
Paying farmers not to farm may sound odd, till the ecological impact of farming is priced in. That includes irrigation, fertiliser and power costs, some of which GoI bears. In the case of paddy in Punjab and Haryana, these costs are considerable, ...

Paying farmers not to farm may sound odd, till the ecological impact of farming is priced in. That includes irrigation, fertiliser and power costs, some of which GoI bears. In the case of paddy in Punjab and Haryana, these costs are considerable, making cultivation unviable without input subsidies alongside price supports. Then there's the matter of ecological damage of unsustainable agriculture. All of these add up to the explicit subsidy the ICRIER paper is suggesting for weaning farmers in northwest India off growing paddy - which can be grown with less damage to the environment in rainfed parts of the country. A green revolution awaits pulses and edible oils that would benefit from both input subsidies and price support. It would also reduce India's import dependence for these crops.
Other countries have found it expedient to pay farmers not to grow selective crops, instead of making them go through with the expense of doing so to claim support prices, and for governments to store such crops in warehouses where they rot or are eaten by rats. India can consider this agri intervention for nutritional security, sustainable farming and an evergreen revolution.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.