Good greenbacks for greenlanders, Mr T?
Once more, Donald Trump is contemplating a purchase of Greenland, drawn by its strategic significance and abundant natural resources. By proposing a buyout instead of coercion, the US could create a partnership that elevates the lives of Greenland...

On paper, the maths looks tempting. Greenland's vast reserves of rare earths, uranium and iron ore could be valued in hundreds of billions. Divide that sum among 57,000-odd Greenlanders, and each citizen could walk away with a life-altering windfall and probably resettle in non-Arctic Miami. In a country largely dependent on Danish subsidies, a better bid could calm nerves, make Greenlanders rich - and US companies and stakeholders richer. A Danmarks Nationalbank report released on Tuesday underlines Greenland's economic vulnerability: 0.8% growth projection this year vis-a-vis 2% in 2022 - as its population continues to diminish.
Yes, Excelpolitik may have its limits. For one, Greenland may not share Trump and his retinue's 'Dig, baby, dig!' evangelical zeal towards resource extraction. Also, with a per-capita GDP of $58,499 (2023) - US ($84,534), India ($2,397) - dangling good money may not do the trick. Also, who sets the valuation? How are resources quantified against volatile commodity markets? What safeguards prevent exploitation once ownership shifts? But before toying with a 'non-consensual' option, why doesn't Trump make an offer that Greenlanders can decide whether to refuse or not? He should be aware that just because it's called Greenland, doesn't mean it's good for golfing.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.