Decongest, by fees and public transport
New York is now charging cars for congestion in Manhattan, becoming the first American city to do this. Similar systems are already in place in cities like Singapore, London and Stockholm. The funds from the charges will be used to improve public ...

Congestion charges by themselves don't lead to fall in traffic. They essentially redistribute traffic among peak and non-peak hours. The toll is inequitable in its effect on the suburbs, which grew out of the need to decongest cities. Fees are also regressive, with the impact felt more by lower-income households and by small businesses in some neighbourhoods. If not handled right, charges can transfer congestion to other parts of a city, such as residential areas. As the first mover in imposing congestion charges in the US, New York will be re-evaluating fundamental assumptions of American urban planning.
The timing of New York's congestion charges has been dictated by politics and there could be efforts by opponents, including Donald Trump, a one-time New Yorker, to block it. That would be a mistake. The US needs a new template over how its cities grow. Seattle, Washington DC and San Francisco are considering the idea of congestion pricing. Their choice will be influenced by New York's experience. There is a body of evidence available on the effects of congestion fees, but not from the US. In India, drastically enhancing and improving urban public transport systems to decongest would make sense, along with selective congestion fees.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.