All that's pledged isn't investment
Saudi Arabia has made headlines by promising a colossal one trillion dollar investment into the US economy. While this is an eye-catching figure, the announcement is vague regarding critical details and deadlines. Experience shows that substantial...

The problem with investment commitments is the lack of enforceability. Indian states routinely trot out giant numbers of promised investments, a big chunk of which never materialises. Take West Bengal. Almost none of the much-touted MoUs materialise, despite the annual jamborees and photo-ops. Real investment is typically pledged conditionally, with specific and general expectations about ease of doing business. If these issues stay unaddressed, 'understandings' fail to turn into horses that beggars plan to ride. Chronic under-delivery on investment signals progressive weakness in the business environment when competing states improve their investment prospects.
Greenfield investment is driven by a definite set of economic parameters, such as proximity to resources and markets. If a political establishment wants to speed up the process, it must offer another set of governance deliverables. Besides, governments may need to commit additional investment to fill gaps in physical and social infra. These steps improve the investment climate, but don't ensure enforceability of pledges. Business conditions may alter, affecting planned investments. The business cycle could alter, affecting capital timelines for capital infusion. The idea would be to reduce governance risks to a point where businesses feel comfortable to commit. But in most cases, announcing romantic intent itself is trotted out as fixing a wedding date. As anyone on their first date knows all too well, that's merely political, not financial.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.