Sachin Tendulkar, the movie: An ode to his battles versus the Akrams, Laras and Warnes
Since Sachin’s most stirring battles were fought against great antagonists and alongside great comrades. So, the movie has to be a multi-starrer.

I’m glad he’s done. Like the Graham Greene biographer who prayed the great man would stop writing novels so he could tidy up his life into a story with an end, I couldn’t wait for Tendulkar to stop playing. Now that he has, I can get on with editing those Tendulkar memories into a proper movie.
There’s lots to leave out; everyone prunes reality to arrive at the truth. To be true to my memories of Tendulkar, I’ve edited out the last two and a half years. Much as I’d like to I can’t show him retiring after the World Cup win in 2011—this is a documentary, not some half-baked biopic— so I’ve done the next best thing. I show him shoulder-borne in blue on that dazzling night in Bombay and then we fade to whites and daylight; the same stadium, still hoist on willing shoulders, only he has just made that lovely speech to say goodbye and instead of crowds exulting there isn’t a dry eye in the Wankhede.
This elision isn’t vandalism, it’s a restoration. Removing layers of varnish from the surface of an Old Master reveals its real colours and these last two years have obscured the man. In one cut we lose the commentators serving up praise like solicitous waiters, Tendulkar’s peers doubling as embedded embalmers, the commemorative idiocy that made this two Test ‘series’ feel like a Papa Doc pageant;it’s gone, like a bad dream that didn’t happen.
Nothing from the IPL either, not a haute frau in attendance nor a cheerleader in sight. Everything in this period goes, including that laboured ODI hundred at Mirpur, to make room for the good stuff. My movie prefers to believe that Tendulkar voluntarily marooned himself on 99 just so he had something else in common with the Don.
The early scenes consist of radio memories played over still pictures of that under-age face. I have no recollection of the 88 at Napier. Maybe it wasn’t telecast and perhaps I didn’t know the short wave frequency for Radio New Zealand. But I could find Test Match Special like a homing pigeon and I remember that Old Trafford hundred like it happened yesterday.
Don Mosey, Brian Johnston, Henry Blofeld, and Christopher Martin-Jenkins were the chorus as this serene seventeen year old did his burning-deck routine and managed, unlike the well-meaning but stupid boy in the poem, a happy ending. Azharuddin hit one of his headlong centuries in India’s first innings but Tendulkar was clearly the man of the match. I listened to his back-foot cover drives before I saw them playedand they were so vividly described that I watched them later with a sense of recognition.
My movie is an album of the strokes in Tendulkar’s repertoire. Tendulkar’s special genius lay in the impossible shots he hit off perfectly good balls.
Impossible because he made those shots look safe, even plausible, when they were not.
There were the essays in self-denial, the shots not played: McGrath left alone, time and time again, inches outside the off-stump; the Sydney double century, starring an absent cover drive, the dour hundred in Chepauk against Waugh’s Invincibles that helped win us the series: no movie about Tendulkar, not even a make-believe one, can ignore his defensive genius.
The innings that I think of most often was played in a losing cause. It is the 136 against the Pakistanis in Chepauk. Tendulkar, ten years into his career, played an innings of ferocious intent against a fine Pakistani attack led by the inventor of the doosra, Saqlain Mushtaq.
He was defeated by a spasming back but it was the reception of this agonizing defeat by the Chepauk crowd, the ovation they gave the Pakistanis, that made his innings and that match exceptional.
The writer is an essayist.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.