IPL: The unreality show
At a certain level, there can be no bigger act of cheating than of players who deliberately underperform for material gain for sport works entirely on faith.

At a certain level, there can be no bigger act of cheating than of players who deliberately underperform for material gain for sport works entirely on faith. There is no intrinsic value in the game itself; it is after all only a made-up game with manufactured pursuits and invented rules. When millions of people choose to believe in the players who perform this charade, and do so with an intensity and passion not found in other walks of life, sport morphs into ecstatic religion. When players cheat like this, it is like a deity picking our pocket at a temple-blind faith gets mocked for its blindness, and the fan is made to feel very foolish for having created such false heroes.
And yet, the idea of cheating is not as black and white as it once was, for players are receiving some mixed signals. Over the years, the character of the sport has changed irrevocably, and along with it, the implicit codes of behaviour that went along with the idea of being a cricketer. The IPL represents the pinnacle of this new avatar of the game. IPL has often been described as a reality show, but in truth it is really a spectacle of the unreal. Nothing in the IPL makes sense in a conventional way. The owners are bigger stars than the players, off-field action if often more engaging than the sport, film stars give cricketing tips to players and Kapil Dev is made to dance. Players are auctioned off periodically without having any say in the team that they play for, teams are routinely shuffled for entertainment and money, 'strategic time-outs' dot a twenty over game, and millions of dollars are paid for obscure players who are then kept on the bench.
When scandals erupt, the guardians of the game seem more interested in protecting the viability of the tournament than in preserving the spirit of the sport. Those on the gravy train are quick to get into the time honoured 'few bad apples/rotten eggs' mode of defensiveness; in truth nobody really wants to know what goes on. The day after the scandal broke, the television coverage from the studio studiously ignored it and focused instead on 'guests' Sonakshi Sinha and Akshay Kumar while the dancing troupe jumped japangly in the background. Even the outrage of the fans that we are seeing today is likely to be transient; the anger will eventually become a consumer product, part of the entire IPL package.
Even the idea of spot-fixing is illustrative of a new engagement with the sport for it is one that separates an individual's action from any final consequence. The outcome of the game is not being bet upon. The idea of match-fixing is still easier to comprehend, but with something like spot-fixing we enter an area of disembodied transaction. Every individual bit of action comes into sharp focus- a bad delivery bowled, a catch dropped, a boundary scored, a run-out missed, each event becomes charged with potential value. In a larger sense, commercial considerations serve to disaggregate the game into bits of value- players get evaluated not only on their performance on their cost-effectiveness. When every individual player is valued differently and often arbitrarily, and teams put together largely for financial reasons that serve the commercial interests of the owners, it is difficult to insist that players put the spirit of the game above their interests. Everything about the IPL looks at value transactionally and in an atomised way; self-interest drives the actions of all key stakeholders. For players to look at the game through a lens of risk and reward is merely an extension of the culture that prevails in and around the tournament.
Those who argue that the IPL cannot be held responsible for the greediness of a few players might be correct technically, for crossing the line is always an individual choice. But the IPL does make it a little easier for players to rationalise their actions. The signals it emits changes the traditional priorities of those involved in the game, and serves to demythologise the very idea of sport. When the interests of those behind the sport supersede the interests of the sport itself, then it becomes legitimate for every individual to put himself first. The 3 players crossed a line they should not have and they must receive exemplary punishment for their actions but they are the only ones responsible for what has happened. And will happen
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.