Goalpost bad, goals worse
The contradiction of growth: The SDGs offer superficial responses such as reduce food waste, make resource use more efficient and 'encourage companies to adopt sustainable practices
The contradiction of growth: The SDGs offer superficial responses such as reduce food waste, make resource use more efficient and 'encourage companies to adopt sustainable practices'.
Growth does not reduce poverty: We need to abandon GDP in favour of a saner measure of human progress - that does not rely on endlessly increasing extraction and consumption.
Inequality gets ignored: This is yet another monumental global challenge that has been handed down to the next generation.
Big drivers of poverty are left unaddressed: The SDGs are eerily silent on greater regulation of financial markets and big banks.
The mis-measurement of poverty: The SDGs stick with the discredited $1.25-per-day measure. If we measure poverty by the more accurate $5-per-day line, the total poverty headcount rises to 4.3 billion people, more than 60% of humanity.
The SDGs fail us. As Arundhati Roy put it, 'we are not fighting to tinker with reforming a system that needs to be replaced'.
From 'Five Reasons to Think Twice About the UN's Sustainable Development Goals', The London School of Economics and Political Science
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.