Congratulating PV Sindhu on her Olympic podium finish may cost brands
Baseline Ventures is sending legal notices seeking Rs 5 crore damages from P&G, Perfetti, Pan Bahar, Apollo 24/7, Aditya Birla Group and others.

Baseline Ventures, the sports marketing agency that manages all commercial deals of Sindhu, will be sending legal notices on her behalf, seeking damages worth ₹5 crore from each of these companies.
“We are surprised that such leading Indian and global firms are resorting to such forms of communication to associate with our athletes, which is in complete breach of their IPR and privacy,” Baseline Ventures MD Tuhin Mishra told ET.
While many fans and companies put out congratulatory posts on social media, these brands used their logos and brand name along with the athlete.
As per marketing experts, this is called ‘moment marketing’.

Amul has been doing it successfully for many years, and last month Domino’s did the same when they announced free pizza for life for silver medal winner Mirabai Chanu.
Only in her case, the pizza brand inked a digital activation pact with the 26-year-old weightlifter later. It was her first deal, post her podium finish at the Tokyo Olympics.

Perfetti Van Malle, P&G and Apollo Hospitals refused to comment.
This is not the first time when brands have been sued for using celebrities or sports athletes. Many brand experts call such practices gimmicky, as they seek to latch on the popularity of the celebrity, without getting into a commercial deal with them.

Apart from the above mentioned brands, Baseline will also send notices to a clutch of banks, including Bank of Maharashtra, Fino Payments Bank, Punjab National Bank, Phone Pe, UCO Bank, HDFC Bank, State Bank of India and Indian Bank.
Offering legal opinion, Kaushik Moitra, partner at law firm Bharucha & Partners, said, “The right of publicity has also evolved from the right of privacy, which is a fundamental right in India. Additionally, a celebrity holds a copyright in their performance and is entitled to restrain others from exploiting their intellectual property for commercial purposes. Thus, a celebrity’s name, voice, image, or other personal attributes cannot be exploited without their permission.”
He added that while a celebrity is by the very nature of their status subject to much discussion and scrutiny among the public, it is also important to recognise that there is actual value attached to the personality of a celebrity.
“Where the personality rights of a celebrity are exploited without their consent, particularly with the intention of monetising such use, the celebrity is within their rights to oppose such unauthorised use,” Moitra added.

A few sports marketing experts, however, feel that sending a legal notice or dragging the brands to courts, seeking damages is too extreme a step. They say that brands have digital marketing agencies and in order to keep their clients in the news, they sometimes get overzealous in their approach.
“Taking the brand to court may be counterproductive, but it is also a brand’s duty to be more responsible. A tweet from Chanu, saying that she likes pizza of a competitor brand, or a post from Sindhu stating she doesn’t eat chewing gum, would be enough to give sleepless nights to a few brand managers,” said the top executive of a sports marketing firm.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.