India bowl out Australia in just 32.3 overs to win first Test by an innings & 132 runs’
Australia lost because their heads were just not in the right space. Spooked by the designer pitch, Australia saw conspiracies and traps where none existed, although to the credit of Pat Cummins and his teammates, they never once publicly complain...
That certainly seemed to be the case for many at the end of the first Test of the Border-Gavaskar Trophy in which India crushed Australia by an innings and 132 runs inside three days.
In the lead-up to the series and the match, it was widely believed that this was a balanced and strong Australian team, one that was high on confidence and had the mental strength and adaptability to succeed in Indian conditions.
What happened was far from that. For starters the team balance was rocked by two missing personnel, Cameron Green, the allrounder, a forced omission through injury and Travis Head, by choice. But, missing these two players was not why Australia lost.
Australia lost because their heads were just not in the right space. Spooked by the designer pitch, Australia saw conspiracies and traps where none existed, although to the credit of Pat Cummins and his teammates, they never once publicly complained about the pitch. And, this is a good thing, given just how well India batted on it.
That Rohit Sharma scored a sparkling century is no surprise given his unquestionable class and cricketing acumen. But, in the first innings, Australia lost their last five wickets for only 15 runs. India’s spinners were just too good for the lower order. Contrast this with India, whose last three added 160, to take the team from a good score to one from which only a miraculous performance could save Australia.
Ravindra Jadeja’s growth as a Test batsman and his consistency has been put down to self-belief. Ravi Shastri, the former coach, explained on air that the coaching staff had always believed in Jadeja, but it was only in the last few years that Jadeja himself began to believe and take responsibility when elevated to No. 5 or No. 6. The manner in which Jadeja allies a compact technique, a clear plan and a genuine desire to take the game forward for his team was evident.

Axar Patel, who is relatively new to Test cricket, also found a way with the bat. This involved getting a good stride in, ensuring his leg did not get in the way of the bat coming down, and not trying anything extravagant.
When the Australian batting unit sits down to take a collective look in the mirror, they must ask themselves how even India’s lower order is finding ways to make runs in these conditions, while their specialist batsmen aren’t. It’s one thing to say that India’s spinners are much better — and this is an undeniable fact, or that their players are more used to the conditions. This is also true.
Against R Ashwin, batsmen either did not have the wherewithal to disturb his rhythm or did not try hard enough to do so. A bowler of his intelligence will not mind conceding the occasional boundary when he is tossing the ball up and enticing the drive, but when you don’t rotate the strike against him, Ashwin is at his most dangerous. This allows him to set up batsmen, using his skill and craft to plan the dismissal, rather than just putting the ball in the right areas and hoping that the pitch will do the rest.
In these conditions, against this Indian bowling attack, simply going with the flow is not good enough. You better have a solid Plan A and stick to it and hope that it works well enough not to have to fall back on Plan B.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.