Which law did Minister of State Sadhvi Niranjan Jyoti break?
Niranjan Jyoti's attempt to divide society into "Ramzadas" and "Haramzadas" was meant to promote enmity between communities.

Nobody can however be charged under this section without the government's sanction. Since hate speech is widely recognized as an exception to the freedom of speech, Section 153A holds to account anybody "promoting enmity between different groups on grounds of religion ... and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony".
Despite the impunity for hate speech in India, this provision often figures in political discourse, especially in the run-up to elections, as it did in the Sadhvi's case in Delhi. The most prominent hate speech cases in the recent past have been against Akbaruddin Owaisi, Raj Thackeray and Varun Gandhi.
But when a PIL petition before the 2014 Lok Sabha poll sought a direction to the Election Commission to curb hate speech, the Supreme Court declined to intervene citing the danger of encroaching on the fundamental right to free speech. One of the grounds on which the Constitution empowers the state to impose reasonable restrictions on free speech is public order.
According to the opposition parties, Niranjan Jyoti's attempt to divide society into "Ramzadas" and "Haramzadas" was meant to promote enmity between communities, which is an ingredient of Section 153A.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.