Supreme Court seeks Centre's response on plea against mode of execution

The plea said that Article 21 (Right to Life) of the Constitution also includes the right of a condemned prisoner to have a dignified mode of execution so that death becomes less painful.

BCCL
Lawyer Rishi Malhotra, who filed the PIL in his personal capacity, has also referred to various apex court judgements in which the practise of hanging a death row convict has been assailed.
NEW DELHI: The SC on Friday sought to know the government response to a PIL seeking to change the mode of carrying out capital punishment in the country – from hanging till a convict is dead to either death by lethal injection or death by a firing squad.

The Law Commission of India had earlier suggested a switch to the more “humane” mode of executing condemned prisoners by lethal injection.

Several US states use this as the mode of execution, though studies have shown that it is equally painful for the convict as drug reaction differs from person to person.


The condemned prisoner in that case is given a lethal concoction of drugs to end his life. A PIL filed by advocate Rishi Malhotra said that hanging was a cruel form of executing a convict as it inflicted great pain and injury and violated his right to die with dignity.

It is barbaric, inhuman and cruel but also against the UN resolutions which mandate member states to carry out capital punishment in a manner that will inflict minimum possible suffering.
Download
The Economic Times Business News App
for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
Download
The Economic Times News App
for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.
READ MORE
ADVERTISEMENT

READ MORE:

LOGIN & CLAIM

50 TIMESPOINTS

More from our Partners

Loading next story
Business News › News › Politics › Supreme Court seeks Centre's response on plea against mode of execution
Text Size:AAA
Success
This article has been saved

*

+