Supreme Court refuses to stay McDonalds' arbitration proceedings against Vikram Bakshi
Singhvi argued that the proceedings before the Company Law Board and the Arbitral Tribunal were essentially the same.

"Sorry," Justices Jasti Chelameswar and Abhay Manohar Sapre, said after hearing senior advocate Abhishek Manu Singhvi, appearing for Bakshi, when he sought a stay on arbitration proceedings.
Singhvi argued that the proceedings before the Company Law Board and the Arbitral Tribunal were essentially the same and would only multiply litigation. He also argued that the joint venture agreement between the two sides had a very limited arbitration clause.
Everything was to be dealt with under Indian law and courts. Only "unresolved" issues were to be referred to arbitration, he argued. But to no avail. The bench did not agree, insisting that they were separate issues.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.