Supreme Court dismisses plea for delimitation exercise in Andhra Pradesh, Telangana
The Supreme Court dismissed a plea seeking delimitation for Andhra Pradesh and Telangana, stating they can't be compared to Jammu and Kashmir. The court emphasized that Article 170(3) of the Constitution prevents such delimitation. Justices noted ...

A division bench comprising justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi observed that the two states cannot be treated on a par with Jammu and Kashmir, where delimitation was undertaken in 2022 and assembly seats were increased.
The bench said that allowing the plea would mean opening floodgates for all other states to approach seeking parity. "We hold that the constitutional mandate under 170(3) serves as a bar. Demand for the delimitation is contrary to the same and thus fails. Jammu & Kashmir, having been reconstituted, is not governed by chapter 3 of part VII of the Constitution. Thus, we find no merit that exclusion of Andhra Pradesh and Telangana from the impugned delimitation notification is arbitrary or violative of the constitution," the bench ruled.
The plea contended that while delimitation was conducted for J&K and the number of seats was increased, Andhra Pradesh and Telangana were left out and that this decision was arbitrary. It also argued that the decision was in violation of the doctrine of legitimate expectations. However, the argument did not find favour with the SC.
"Doctrine of legitimate expectation is a well settled principle, though it does not lead to any legal right, and it cannot override any express provision of law and it needs to be reasonable and in consonance with the statute. Expectation under the Andhra Pradesh Act cannot be seen in isolation as it is subject to Article 170 of the Constitution," the bench held.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.