Supreme Court caps RTI fees at Rs 50, Rs 5 for photocopying
Activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan appearing for the petitioners Common Cause alleged that the higher fees would disincentivise information-seekers.

A two-judge bench of Justices Adarsh Kumar Goel and UU Lalit passed the order on a batch of petitions challenging the RTI rules of various High Courts and the Chhattisgarh Assembly which had prescribed high fees.
Activist-lawyer Prashant Bhushan appearing for the petitioners alleged that the higher fees would disincentivise information-seekers.
The petition filed by the NGO Common Cause claimed that the Central Information Commission had repeatedly asked the Allahabad High Court to modify its RTI rules, but its pleas were ignored.
The Allahabad High Court was charging Rs 500 for a reply under the RTI Act, the petition claimed.
A similar plea was filed against the Chhattisgarh High Court which had dismissed a petition of an applicant Dinesh Kumar Soni, and imposed a cost of Rs 10,000 on him for seeking information.
In his petition, Soni had challenged the Rule 5 and Rule 6(1) of the Chhattisgarh Vidhan Sabha Secretariat Right to Information (Regulation of fees and costs) Rules 2011, which require that a person making an application under section 6(1) of the RTI Act was required to pay Rs 300.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.