Supreme Court dismisses plea to change India’s name
Representing the petitioner, lawyer Ashwin Vaish argued that the term India was derived from a foreign word and was of Persian origin. The CJI pointed out that the constituent assembly debates showed that this was debated at length before a call w...

A three-judge bench led by CJI SA Bobde sought to know from the petitioner, Namah, a Delhi resident, why he had moved the court when India is already called Bharat in the Constitution.
Representing the petitioner, lawyer Ashwin Vaish argued that the term India was derived from a foreign word and was of Persian origin. The CJI pointed out that the constituent assembly debates showed that this was debated at length before a call was taken on inserting ‘India that is Bharat’ in the Constitution.
He dismissed the plea and instead asked the petitioner to submit his petition as a representation to the home and parliamentary affairs ministries.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.