Opposition on board for Judge Varma's ouster: Kiren Rijiju

Days ahead of Parliament's monsoon session, Union Minister Kiren Rijiju said prominent opposition parties have given their in-principle approval to support the motion to remove Allahabad High Court judge Yashwant Varma and the process of collecting signatures could begin soon.

Rijiju, who holds the charge of Parliamentary Affairs Ministry, said an inquiry committee will be set up by the presiding officer of the House concerned to probe charges against Justice Varma.

According to the Judges (Inquiry) Act of 1968, once a motion to remove a judge is admitted in any of the houses, the speaker or the chairman, as the case may be, will constitute a three-member committee to investigate the grounds on which the removal (or, in popular term, impeachment) has been sought.


The committee consists of the Chief Justice of India (CJI) or a Supreme Court judge, the chief justice of one of the 25 high courts and a "distinguished jurist."

For Lok Sabha, signatures of a minimum 100 MPs is required. For the Rajya Sabha, the requirement is the support of at least 50 MPs.

However, he added that the government is yet to decide whether the motion would be brought in the Lok Sabha or Rajya Sabha.

"I have spoken to prominent opposition parties who have in principle agreed for his removal. We will follow the laid down procedure (for the process). The government wants matters related to judiciary to be beyond political lines and there should be consensus and unified stand," Rijiju said.

He further said the government will start collecting the signatures of MPs - after deciding which House should initiate the process - next week.

The Monsoon session will commence from July 21 and end on August 21.

Rijiju said since the matter involves corruption in the judiciary, the government wants all political parties to be on board.

On being asked about the report of the in-committee which proved the cash discovery incident at Justice Varma's official residence here, he said the report of the three-judge panel had not indicted Justice Varma and was meant to recommend future course of action as Parliament can only remove a judge.

A fire incident at Justice Varma's residence in the national capital in March, when he was a judge at the Delhi High Court, had led to the discovery of several burnt sacks of banknotes in the outhouse.

Though the judge claimed ignorance about the cash, the Supreme Court-appointed committee indicted him after speaking to a number of witnesses and recording his statement.

Then-CJI Sanjiv Khanna is believed to have prodded him to resign but Justice Varma dug in his heels.

The apex court has since repatriated him to his parent court, the Allahabad High Court, where he has not been assigned any judicial work.

Justice Khanna had written to the president and the PM, recommending the removal, which is the procedure for axing members of the higher judiciary from service.