Habeas Corpus petition for Omar in SC
Senior advocate Kapil Sibal, appearing for the petitioner, mentioned the matter for urgent listing before a bench headed by Justice N V Ramana. Sibal told the bench that they have filed a habeas corpus petition challenging the detention of Abdulla...

Appearing for the petitioner, senior advocate Kapil Sibal pleaded before a bench of Justice NV Ramana for an urgent listing and hearing to which the bench agreed. No date has been set so far for any hearing. Hearing of a habeas corpus petition mandates that the detenue be produced before the court to see for itself if he was safe and sound.
The Constitution allows any detenue to move the SC under Article 32 for enforcing one’s Fundamental Rights of life and liberty. The petition said that Abdullah had not challenged his arbitrary detention despite knowing that the exercise of the power was “mala fide” as the intent was to incarcerate the entire National Conference leadership that had stood with India.
“The exercise of power under the CrPC was clearly mala fide to ensure that the opposition to abrogation of Article 370 of the Constitution is silenced.” Thereafter, he was served with another order on February 5, 2010, under the JK PSA, 1978, stating that his detention was “necessary for the maintenance of public order,” the petition contended.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.