Meghalaya High Court: ‘Hindu Rashtra’ ruling unconstitutional

A single judge, in a case, had referred to the illegal immigration from outside and suggested a Hindu Rashtra as a way out to protect the Hindu way of life.

Agencies
A division bench, comprising Chief Justice Mohammad Yaqoob Mir and Justice HS Thangkhiew, said that the single judge’s order was “legally flawed” and “inconsistent with constitutional principles”.
A two-judge bench of the Meghalaya High Court on Friday set aside a controversial single judge order suggesting that the country be declared Hindu Rashtra to prevent it from being overwhelmed by immigrants of other religions.

A single judge had created a controversy when he had in a case involving domicile certificate of a local resident referred to the illegal immigration from outside and suggested a Hindu Rashtra as a way out to protect the Hindu way of life. Today, a division bench, comprising Chief Justice Mohammad Yaqoob Mir and Justice HS Thangkhiew, said that the single judge’s order was “legally flawed” and “inconsistent with constitutional principles”.
Download
The Economic Times Business News App
for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
Download
The Economic Times News App
for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.
READ MORE
ADVERTISEMENT

READ MORE:

LOGIN & CLAIM

50 TIMESPOINTS

More from our Partners

Loading next story
Business News › News › Politics › Meghalaya High Court: ‘Hindu Rashtra’ ruling unconstitutional
Text Size:AAA
Success
This article has been saved

*

+