Jan Lokpal Bill: Is Hazare's arm-twisting method of protest dangerous for democracy?
It was absurd to suggest that Anna and his supporters were egged on by a foreign hand, Bhartiya Janata Party, VHP and RSS.

Resistance backfired because the termite of corruption has reached every branch of administration exasperating citizens, who remain frustrated in the absence of an effective redressal system. The Supreme Court had felt so in 2003 and said: “The tentacles of corruption are spreading fast in the society corroding the moral fibre and consequentially in most cases the economic structure of the country. It has assumed alarming proportions in recent times.”
Raja of Manda, Vishwanath Pratap Singh, in the late 1980s rebelled against Congress to float a National Front to fight corruption, which he smelled only when the Bofors scam hit the headlines. A close aide of Rajiv Gandhi had then ridiculed Singh’s outfit as “national affront”.
A victorious Singh became the Prime Minister and laid the foundation for coalition governments in India. Experience shows that fruits of his crusade against corruption got annulled as the coalition governments produced some of the most corrupt regimes.
Anna’s adamant fast for the passage of Jan Lokpal Bill in Parliament reflects the people’s frustration over corruption which slows down benefits reaching the needy, be it admission to schools or getting a job. The genuineness of grievances may not always lend sanctity to the method of agitation. Is arm-twisting , howsoever peaceful, of institutions which have been created through years of running of democracy not muzzling of views? None can deny need for course correction though. But courses are not corrected by whipping up a frenzy among people by promising that the Jan Lokpal Bill is the only path to nirvana from corruption. What is needed is self-correction.
Anna’s crusade against corruption is right. But, is the ‘you agree or I fast unto death’ arm-twisting method correct? Alarmingly, Anna supporters are increasingly adopting the ‘either you support us or you are against us’ argument. Stifling dissent by branding is dangerous to democracy and it has been in vogue for sometime in this country.
If one disagrees with Congress, he becomes a Sanghi. If he counters BJP, he is christened a leftist. If he counters a social activist, he becomes part of antisocial elements or fascist forces. What they forget is that a citizen has right to free speech that includes the right to dissent.
The other way round is equally frustrating. Elected representatives who get a mandate to rule for five years are equally intolerant towards their policies and working being put to question. They argue that if people are unhappy they have the right to vote them out of power after 5 years. Do they mean for 5 years no one should raise a voice? It was absurd to suggest that Anna and his supporters were egged on by a foreign hand, BJP, VHP and RSS.
In a democratic set up, institutions need to be invigorated, not bypassed or ridiculed .Anna’s theme is right, but his method of agitation may not be. Team Anna needs to introspect on the need for a wider debate on the core issue — elimination of corruption. At the same time, it must be careful in whipping up a frenzy among youngsters widening the width of their aspiration.
Can Team Anna guarantee political, social and economical freedom and justice through this agitation they call a revolution? Can they promise that the ‘revolution’ will create an egalitarian social and economic polity where everyone will be able to enjoy basic human rights, freedom and liberty? We will wish him and his team luck in this endeavour.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.