Rafale offsets deal: Anil Ambani was Indian government's choice, says Francois Hollande
Former French president Francois Hollande has reportedly told this to a French news website.
“We did not have a say. The Indian government proposed this service group, and Dassault negotiated with Ambani. We did not have a choice, we accepted the interlocutor that was given to us,” Hollande was quoted by Mediapart. The interview was published in French on Friday and excerpts of it were put on Twitter by a French newspaper journalist.
“On the other hand, this group did not have (any reason) to thank me for anything. I could not have imagined that this was in any way connected to a Julie Gayet film,” he said. (Anil Ambani-led Reliance Entertainment had entered into an agreement to produce a movie with actor Julie Gayet, who is also Hollande’s partner.) The defence ministry spokesperson immediately responded to the report stating that this was being verified.
“The report referring to fmr French President Mr Hollande’s statement that GOI insisted upon a particular firm as offset partner for the Dassault Aviation in Rafale is being verified. It is reiterated that neither GOI nor French Govt had any say in the commercial decision,” the ministry posted on Twitter. If corroborated, Hollande’s statement would contradict the Indian government’s stand that the pact between Dassault and Reliance was a commercial one between two private parties, and that the government had no say in it.
DECIDING FACTOR
The Rafale deal, which entails procuring 36 jets in ‘fly away’ condition worth about Rs 59,000 crore, has a 50% offset clause, amounting to Rs 30,000 crore. This is to be executed by Dassault and its partners in India. Under the offset clause of the defence procurement procedure, a foreign company has to invest back a portion of the deal in India. Dassault and Reliance Defence had announced their joint venture — Dassault Reliance Aerospace Limited (DRAL), in which Reliance Aerostructure held 51% and Dassault Aviation 49% — for implementing the offsets.
There have been no reactions yet from Dassault, the French Government or Reliance Defence. However, French industry sources said they were waiting for more information on the exact statements made by the former President and that the decision on offsets partners was a commercial one. The deciding factor, they said, was suitable land needed to set up a production line for Falcon jets. The land required access to an active runway as was the case with the joint venture facility at Mihan.
The offset clause kicks in only three years after signing the contract, which in this case happened in September 2016. In a statement issued in February, the defence ministry had stated, “No Indian offset partner for the 2016 deal for 36 Rafale Aircraft has been so far selected by the vendor (DA) because as per the applicable guidelines, DA is free to select the Indian offset partners and provide their details at the time of seeking offset credits, or one year prior to discharge of offset obligation.” Meanwhile, the Congress was quick to pounce on the opportunity.
Statement by the Ministry of Europe and Foreign Affairs on the inter governmental agreement concluded on 23 septemb… https://t.co/dizZUaR7Dp
— Alexandre Ziegler (@FranceinIndia) 1537557891000She was questioning why the Congress feels it was wrong. Sitharaman was countering the Congress’ allegation that staterun Hindustan Aeronautics Limited (HAL) was overlooked in favour of Reliance Defence for the offset deal with Dassault, in a case of crony capitalism.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.