India opposes UN resolution on moratorium on death penalty
The resolution was, adopted with 115 votes in favour to 38 against, with 31 abstentions following an “intense discussion,”.

India’s representative Mayank Joshi said every state had a sovereign right to determine its own legal system, which was why he had voted for the amendment. But the counsellor at India’s UN Mission said he had voted against the resolution “because it contravened statutory law in India”.
The resolution was, however, adopted with 115 votes in favour to 38 against, with 31 abstentions following an “intense discussion,” said a statement on the UN web-site.
The amendment was passed by 76 votes in favour, 72 against, 26 abstentions. Explaining India’s stance on the issues, Joshi said: “In India, the death penalty is exercised in the ‘rarest of rare’ cases, where the crime committed is so heinous as to shock the conscience of society.”
He said Indian law provides for “all requisite procedural safeguards, including the right to a fair hearing by an independent court, the presumption of innocence, the minimum guarantees for the defence, and the right to review by a higher court”.
He said the resolution “sought to promote a moratorium on executions with a view to abolishing the death penalty”. “My delegation therefore, has voted against the resolution as a whole as it goes against Indian statutory law,” he added.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.