High Court’s 1995 ruling offers hope to Jammu and Kashmir's LGBT community
Legal opinion is divided on whether the high court needs to make an order that the Section in Ranbir Penal Code.

However, legal opinion is divided on whether the high court needs to make an order that the Section in Ranbir Penal Code corresponding to Section 377 of the IPC is the same.
Advocate Saurav Kirpal — who was part of the legal team that fought for legal rights of the LGBT community in the apex court — said a division bench of the J&K HC comprising Justice S Rizvi and R Nehru had ruled in 1995 “once the Supreme Court has held Section 303 of the Indian Penal Code (death penalty for murder by a life convict) violated Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution, as a natural and logical corollary Section 303 of the Ranbir Penal Code (RPC) violated the same.”
Kirpal’s views came in the backdrop of the uncertainty of the LGBT community in J&K if the Supreme Court ruling applied to it as it did not mention the Ranbir Penal Code.
However, senior advocate Anand Grover feels the ruling would not apply to J&K.
“The intricacies of the law are the same, but it is a different code,” he contended. He said someone from the community in the state will have to challenge the RPC. “We cannot challenge it unless somebody from Kashmir comes forward.”
Section 303, IPC and Section 303, RPC, are absolutely identical and therefore, the mandate of the judgment of the Supreme Court was directly and automatically applied toSection 303 of RPC in the 1995 ruling. The question is whether the Section corresponding to 377 in RPC is identical.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.