Delhi High Court sets aside Centre's ban on 344 fixed dose combinations, terms it haphazard
Govt defends process followed to ban FDCs, argues that these medicines are not fit for consumption.

Justice Rajiv Sahai Endlaw ruled in favour of the industry in an 82-page order. “To say the least, the central government, though acting in public interest, seems to have gone about it in a haphazard manner,” the order said. “All 344 notifications… purportedly in exercise of power under Section 26A of the Drugs Act were found to be issued without following the procedure statutorily prescribed to be followed prior to issuance thereof.”
According to the order, the expert committee constituted to consider applications for approval of these FDCs by the Centre went into the aspects of risk to consumers, therapeutic value and therapeutic justification instead. The government stands by its notification and the process followed to ban these FDCs. “Irrespective of the high court verdict, we are convinced that this is a public health concern,” a senior government official told ET on condition of anonymity.
According to the official, the government intends to continue with its petitions at the Supreme Court to transfer and hear afresh all the cases related to the FDC issue. The apex court is expected to hear this petition on Friday. The government banned 344 FDCs on March 10, the impact of which was estimated to affect around 6,000 medicine brands. It was also expected to shave over Rs 3,000 crore from the Indian market estimated to have grown to over Rs 1 lakh crore.
The government and industry were at loggerheads over the move, with the central drug regulator arguing it acted in public interest after an expert committee found those medicines "irrational" and “unsafe” for consumption. The industry claimed that marketing approvals were granted after following the procedures. The ban hit several popular brands like Corex, Saridon, D’Cold Total and Vicks Action 500 Extra.
IPA, a lobby group for many of the large domestic drug makers involved in the proceedings, claims that several medicine brands in the government’s ban list were not irrational. “We fully support the health ministry’s initiative of banning irrational combinations as long as it is done scientifically and in due process of law,” IPA secretary general DG Shah said.
Health activists have vehemently opposed the judgement over patient safety issues. “This is a decision that will undermine public health and patient safety,” said Leena Menghaney, a lawyer on public health and access to medicines.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.