Experts differ on government's decision on Article-370; some hail, others call it 'misadventure'
Senior advocate and constitutional law expert Rakesh Dwivedi said: "It (the decision) is completely legal. There is no chance of succeeding of plea against the government's decision."

The Modi government has abolished Article 370 and simultaneously moved a separate bill to bifurcate the state into two separate Union Territories of Jammu and Kashmir, and Ladakh.
Senior advocate and constitutional law expert Rakesh Dwivedi said: "It (the decision) is completely legal. There is no chance of succeeding of plea against the government's decision."
"It was a long overdue historic step. It should go and it is no more required. It is a welcome step. Kashmir was also open for outsiders so I don't understand why there should be Article 35 A."
On the other hand, former Union Law minister and senior Congress leader and advocate Ashwini Kumar said, "The decision of the Union govt to alter the status of the Jammu and Kashmir is fraught with serious political consequences for the nation."
While former Attorney General Soli Sorabjee was of the view that "nothing revolutionary has been done (by the government)" as now the laws which were not applicable to the state till now will be applicable now.
"It is very complicated legal situation and I have not fully analysed it. It appears what they (Centre) have superseded the old Presidential order," former Solicitor General and senior advocate Harish Salve said.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.