Delhi court to pronounce quantum of sentence in Uphaar case
A Delhi Sessions Court will pronounce the quantum of sentence to 12 persons, who were convicted in connection with the 1997 Uphaar Cinema Hall blaze case.
By Agencies |
NEW DELHI: A Delhi Sessions Court will on Thursday pronounce the quantum of sentence to 12 persons, who were convicted in connection with the 1997 Uphaar Cinema Hall blaze case.
The court on Wednesday deferred the sentencing in the case till today as the arguments remained inconclusive.
Additional Sessions Judge Mamta Sehgal had said that she will pronounce the quantum of sentence against all the 12 convicts, after hearing the remaining arguments of the defence and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
The court on Monday declared Gopal and Sushil Ansal, the owners of the cinema hall, guilty of criminal negligence in the case. Both have been convicted under Section 304A of Indian Penal Code for causing death of person/persons by rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide.
They both can be sentenced to a maximum imprisonment of two years along with a fine.
The verdict came 10 years after the tragedy in which 59 people lost their lives during the screening of the Hindi film, "Border".
The court also convicted 10 other accused in the case. They are R. K. Sharma, Ajit Chaudhary, N. S. Chopra, Manmohan Uniyal, Shyam Sunder Sharma, N. D. Tiwari, Hanswaroop Panwar, B. M. Satija, A. K. Gera and Beer Singh.
Four accused - - R. M. Puri, K. L. Malhotra (both senior employees of hall), S. N. Dandona (Executive Engineer of the Public Works Department) and Delhi Fire Services officer Surender Dutt - - have died during the trial.
The CBI had filed a chargesheet on November 15, 1997, and the court admitted it on January 19, 1998.
The Association of the Victims of Uphaar Tragedy (AVUT) had lodged an FIR alleging death due to negligence against Gopal and Sushil Ansal.
The CBI had alleged that the accused were directly and criminally negligent in the management of the theatre.
Senior advocate Harish Salve had contended that owners of the cinema hall were liable for penal action.
During the 10-year-old trial, the CBI had examined 115 witnesses. Among them, eight witnesses, termed as relatives of Ansals, have already turned hostile.
Fifty-nine people were choked to death, while 109 survived with injuries after the Uphaar Cinema caught fire leading to a stampede on June 13, 1997.
The theatre was engulfed when an overheated generator burst in the basement of the building. Men, women and children all scampered to rush out of the four cinema hall exits.
The court on Wednesday deferred the sentencing in the case till today as the arguments remained inconclusive.
Additional Sessions Judge Mamta Sehgal had said that she will pronounce the quantum of sentence against all the 12 convicts, after hearing the remaining arguments of the defence and the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI).
The court on Monday declared Gopal and Sushil Ansal, the owners of the cinema hall, guilty of criminal negligence in the case. Both have been convicted under Section 304A of Indian Penal Code for causing death of person/persons by rash or negligent act not amounting to culpable homicide.
They both can be sentenced to a maximum imprisonment of two years along with a fine.
The verdict came 10 years after the tragedy in which 59 people lost their lives during the screening of the Hindi film, "Border".
ADVERTISEMENT
The court also convicted 10 other accused in the case. They are R. K. Sharma, Ajit Chaudhary, N. S. Chopra, Manmohan Uniyal, Shyam Sunder Sharma, N. D. Tiwari, Hanswaroop Panwar, B. M. Satija, A. K. Gera and Beer Singh.
Four accused - - R. M. Puri, K. L. Malhotra (both senior employees of hall), S. N. Dandona (Executive Engineer of the Public Works Department) and Delhi Fire Services officer Surender Dutt - - have died during the trial.
The CBI had filed a chargesheet on November 15, 1997, and the court admitted it on January 19, 1998.
The Association of the Victims of Uphaar Tragedy (AVUT) had lodged an FIR alleging death due to negligence against Gopal and Sushil Ansal.
ADVERTISEMENT
The CBI had alleged that the accused were directly and criminally negligent in the management of the theatre.
Senior advocate Harish Salve had contended that owners of the cinema hall were liable for penal action.
ADVERTISEMENT
During the 10-year-old trial, the CBI had examined 115 witnesses. Among them, eight witnesses, termed as relatives of Ansals, have already turned hostile.
Fifty-nine people were choked to death, while 109 survived with injuries after the Uphaar Cinema caught fire leading to a stampede on June 13, 1997.
The theatre was engulfed when an overheated generator burst in the basement of the building. Men, women and children all scampered to rush out of the four cinema hall exits.
Download
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
Download
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.
ADVERTISEMENT
