Congress leader Rajesh Soni arrested for Facebook posts on Operation Sindoor, booked under new BNS law

Rajesh Soni, a senior Congress leader in Gujarat, was arrested early Friday by the state’s Cyber Crime Cell over a pair of Facebook posts that police allege endangered national morale and spread misinformation about a major military operation.

The posts were related to Operation Sindoor, an ongoing mission by the Indian armed forces targeting terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-Occupied Kashmir (PoK). Soni now faces charges under two sections of the recently enacted Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS)—sections 152 and 353(1)(a).

What the police say sparked the arrest

The FIR, filed by the CID Cyber Crime team on Thursday, cited two Facebook posts made by Soni.


One of them depicted Prime Minister Narendra Modi wearing a fighter pilot uniform in a poster-like image. In another, Soni allegedly claimed that “the Indian government surrendered during the operation,” an accusation the police say could undermine both the mission and the morale of troops deployed on the ground.

Superintendent of Police (CID-Cyber Crime), Bharatsinh Tank, said, “Soni was accused of breaking defence personnel's morale and putting India's sovereignty in danger through misleading posts on Facebook.”

Tank went on to say, “We arrested Soni for his posts which could break the armed forces’ morale and send a wrong message to soldiers that their contribution and sacrifice on the battlefield will go in vain.”

What the charges actually mean

Soni has been charged under Section 152 of the BNS, which deals with acts that endanger the sovereignty, unity, and integrity of India. This section carries serious consequences, including up to life imprisonment or a minimum of seven years’ jail, plus a fine.

The second charge—Section 353(1)(a)—relates to statements that could incite public mischief. This legal provision, too, has teeth and signals the government’s intent to regulate what it views as provocative or destabilising online behaviour, especially during military operations.

The arrest did not go unnoticed by Soni’s party colleagues.

Shortly after news broke, several Congress leaders gathered at the CID’s office in Gandhinagar in protest. Leading the charge was Gujarat Congress president Shaktisinh Gohil, who described the police action as disproportionate and politically motivated.

Gohil said, “He only tried to highlight that soldiers need to get their due credit instead of the govt spending taxpayers' money on publicity.”

He also accused the authorities of cracking down on free expression at a time when the nation should be focusing on supporting its armed forces, not silencing dissent.

Operation Sindoor has become a national talking point in recent weeks. The Indian military launched the mission with the stated goal of eliminating terror infrastructure in Pakistani territory and PoK. It has been projected by the government as a demonstration of India’s zero-tolerance policy towards cross-border terrorism.

But the operation has also sparked debates over public narrative management. As the conflict plays out on the ground, its portrayal in digital spaces has become sensitive—especially with a politically charged environment and general elections in view.

The government's actions suggest it sees misinformation as a direct threat to the morale of soldiers and the success of such operations. At the same time, critics argue that there is a thin line between national interest and political convenience when it comes to controlling narratives.

Soni’s arrest under the new BNS framework could mark a pivotal moment in how India enforces online accountability. It raises difficult questions: Where does one draw the line between political critique and disinformation? Who decides whether a post is morale-breaking or simply provocative?

For now, Rajesh Soni remains in custody, his party defiant, and the legal system gearing up for what may become a high-profile case on digital speech and national security.

(With inputs from TOI)