Coffingate gets formal burial; SC throws out PIL after CBI says all accused discharged by court for lack of evidence
A PIL had been filed shortly after in 2004 in the apex court seeking a CBI probe into the scam which caused much hue and cry in the public.

A PIL had been filed shortly after in 2004 in the apex court seeking a CBI probe into the scam which caused much hue and cry in the public. The court had subsequently ordered the CBI to probe these allegations.
The top investigating agency had lodged an FIR in 2006 and after a probe filed a charge sheet against several accused including former Defence Minister George Fernandes and other top serving and retired army officials. But the trial court discharged all the accused in the case in Dec 2013 for lack of evidence.
On Monday, in a status report submitted to the top court, the CBI contended that the PIL had become irrelevant after the trial court discharged all the accused. The agency claimed it could not get enough evidence to establish guilt against the accused persons, including middlemen and foreign firms who received the kickbacks, despite efforts.
The purchases were made during the earlier NDA regime. The agency, through counsel R. Balasubramanian, told a bench headed by Justice T.S. Thakur, next in line to be the Chief Justice of India, that the PIL should be dismissed in the light of these developments.
The bench them dismissed the PIL, filed by lawyer K.G. Dhananjay Chouhan, which had alleged a huge scam in the post-Kargil purchases involving politicians, middlemen and several foreign firms.
The CBI registered a case in the Barak missile case in 2006 against Fernandes, his associate Jaya Jaitly, R.K. Jain, Sushil Kumar and arms dealer Suresh Nanda, but all of them were discharged in 2013.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.