Armed forces are answerable to government, or there would be martial law, Supreme Court says
The petitioner said that the armed forces are responsible only to the President and that the government shouldn't interfere in their decision making process.

A bench of Justices Amitava Roy and U U Lalit made this observation as it dismissed a plea seeking action against Defence Minister Manohar Parrikar for allegedly interfering and claiming credit for the surgical strikes conducted by the Indian Army in PoK.
"This plea is not maintainable and is hence dismissed. Armed forces are answerable to the government, otherwise you will have martial law in this country. We don't see any merit in the plea," the bench said.
Advocate M L Sharma, who had filed the plea, said that Union Ministers including the Defence Minister had been claiming credit for the surgical strikes carried out by the Indian Army, for which they are not entitled to because as per the provisions of the Constitution, the President is the head of the armed forces.
He alleged that the armed forces' action was being used for the personal interests of a few.
Sharma sought that prosecution be initiated against those who tried to interfere and claim credit for the operations carried out by the armed forces.
To this, the bench said "what is the personal interest in this? Armed forces are answerable to the government."
The court said the plea was not maintainable and hence dismissed.
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.