1984 riots case: Court satisfied with video recording facility
District Judge Amar Nath saw the arrangements during the hearing in which two videographers installed cameras inside the courtroom.

District Judge Amar Nath saw the arrangements during the hearing in which two videographers installed cameras inside the courtroom.
The CBI's prosecutor and counsel representing the accused also said they were satisfied with the arrangements being put in place after which the court fixed the case for April 26 for recording of statement of prosecution witness.
"I am satisfied that now the proceedings of this case can be videographed," the judge said and asked the CBI to call its witness for recording of statement on the next date of hearing.
The case was transferred from Karkardooma court to Patiala House court here by the Delhi High Court which had directed the district judge to video record the proceedings at the cost of the accused.
On the last date of hearing, Kumar and other two accused, Brahmanand Gupta and Ved Prakash, had told the court that they were ready to bear the expenses of videography of proceedings in the matter.
These three accused are facing trial on charges of murder and rioting in the case pertaining to killing of Surjit Singh in Sultanpuri here.
The proceedings in the case were earlier stayed after the victim and complainant Joginder Singh had approached the high court seeking transfer of the case to another court alleging that the evidence was not being properly recorded.
While transferring the case, the high court had made it clear that the transfer was "warranted to protect and uphold the dignity of the judicial system and to promote the faith of citizens in courts of law".
The Economic Times Business News App for the Latest News in Business, Sensex, Stock Market Updates & More.
The Economic Times News App for Quarterly Results, Latest News in ITR, Business, Share Market, Live Sensex News & More.