'Foreign MNC behaving like lala company': Techie claims every minute is tracked, employees left glued to screens, no lunch and coffee breaks

A heated discussion has erupted online after claims surfaced that a foreign multinational company is allegedly tracking employee work hours down to the minute. According to a post on Reddit, an employee claimed that the company has mandated the client to work for "8.15 hours with minute to minute tracking using Software without any lunch or coffee breaks". The post further claimed that the "employees have to mandatorily stick their eyes glued to the laptop screen for straight 8+ hours, otherwise timesheets are not getting approved".

The Reddit post has sparked concerns about workplace pressure, burnout, and shrinking flexibility in modern corporate culture.

ALSO READ: “7.2 LPA to 16?”: Recruiter says he’s “out of touch with today’s generation” after 100% salary hike expectation

“Feels Like a Lala Company”: Employee Sparks Debate

The controversy began after a tech employee shared that their foreign MNC client has mandated strict 8.15-hour work tracking, monitored through software that records activity almost minute-by-minute.

According to the post, employees are expected to remain actively engaged throughout the entire workday, with little to no room for relaxed breaks.



The user claimed:

Even short coffee or lunch breaks feel restricted
Continuous laptop activity is expected
Timesheets may not be approved if inactive time is detected
Monitoring is so strict that even “idle time” is questioned

ALSO READ: Uday Kotak’s AI-wake up call

The post described the situation as “scary times ahead,” adding that bypass methods like mouse movement tricks are reportedly ineffective.

Breaks Under Pressure: Lunch and Coffee Time in Question

What has shocked many readers is the claim that even basic workplace pauses are becoming difficult.

Traditionally, employees are expected to have structured breaks during an 8-hour shift. However, the viral post suggests a shift toward constant screen-time accountability, where every minute is tracked and justified.

This has raised concerns about:

Work-life balance erosion
Mental fatigue due to continuous monitoring
Increasing pressure to stay “active” on systems at all times

“No Way to Bypass It”: Growing Sense of Surveillance

The employee further alleged that the monitoring system is strict enough that simple workarounds do not work, adding to the sense of surveillance at work.

This has led to a broader discussion online about whether modern productivity tools are crossing a line—from efficiency tracking to excessive employee surveillance. Many users expressed discomfort with the idea of being watched continuously during work hours, calling it stressful and demotivating.

AI Comparison Argument Enters the Conversation

Interestingly, the discussion also drifted into a broader critique of modern systems, including AI tools and automated workflows.

Some users compared strict workplace monitoring with rising dissatisfaction around AI-generated content, suggesting that over-automation and over-control—whether in communication, customer service, or office tracking—often leads to frustration and disengagement.

Internet Reaction: Mixed Opinions on Work Tracking Culture

The post quickly went viral after being shared across platforms, including references to similar reports in media discussions. Reactions were sharply divided and supporters of strict tracking argue:

Companies need measurable productivity
Billing clients require accurate time reporting
Remote and hybrid work demands accountability tools

Critics argue:

Constant tracking reduces trust in employees
Productivity cannot be measured only by screen activity
Strict monitoring may push skilled workers to leave
Creativity and problem-solving suffer under pressure

Some users also warned that such practices could backfire in the long run by driving away experienced professionals and lowering overall output quality.

The Bigger Debate: Productivity vs Pressure

At the heart of the controversy lies a growing global workplace debate: Should companies prioritize strict measurable output, or trust-based flexible productivity?

With more firms adopting hybrid and remote setups, organizations are increasingly relying on monitoring tools. But employees argue that excessive tracking risks turning modern workplaces into high-pressure environments with little autonomy.

Social media reaction

The incident has triggered strong reactions from employees and internet users, with many questioning whether such strict monitoring is becoming the new normal in IT and corporate jobs. "How does the tracking work? Is it detecting eye movement? Seems too much," a curious user asked.

"Would you stay at a company that tracks your every minute and expects 8+ hours of continuous screen time with no real breaks? Do you think this kind of extreme employee monitoring improves productivity, or does it just drive away good talent and lead to worse work in the long run?," asked another.

"Many of these so called ‘MNC’s are nothing but lala companies in disguise. They register a tiny office somewhere in US, UK, Canada and call themselves MNC lol," another one quipped.