Delhi-NCR parents plan to buy classroom air purifiers for kids as smog season approaches

As Delhi-NCR prepares for the annual smog season, parents at a leading school in the region are reportedly considering pooling money to purchase air purifiers for their children's nursery classrooms. The move, shared in a viral post on X, has sparked a debate over whether families or schools should bear the responsibility for protecting young children from worsening air pollution.

Delhi-based professional Anirudh Arun shared the account on X, saying parents were discussing buying air purifiers from brands such as Dyson, Honeywell and Sharp for classrooms. The plan reportedly emerged after parents raised concerns about the school's existing air-filtration arrangements and questioned whether they were sufficient to protect children during periods of poor air quality.

Also Read: 53 iPhones: Dubai man completes three-year Apple launch hat-trick with new Duo, from first iPhone to iPhone 18 Pro Max

Why Delhi-NCR parents are considering buying classroom air purifiers

According to Arun's post, some parents questioned why the school was not purchasing the air purifiers itself. The school reportedly responded that its air-conditioning systems were equipped with HEPA filters that could address dust to some extent. However, the explanation did not satisfy the parents, who began considering additional air-purification devices for the nursery classrooms.

Parents also reportedly asked what had happened to the air purifiers installed in classrooms the previous year. Arun said the school explained that the devices moved with students as they advanced to the next grade.


As a result, purifiers that had been used in first-grade classrooms the previous year were reportedly moved to second-grade classrooms, leaving parents of younger children considering buying new units for their children's rooms.

The account highlights how concerns about winter air pollution are influencing decisions families make about their children's school environment, even before the smog season intensifies.

Viral post sparks debate over who should protect children from pollution

Arun's post drew attention to the growing role parents may be expected to play in addressing an air-quality problem that affects entire communities.

“Welcome to the incredibly complex world of public-health moving into private hands,” he wrote.

The discussion resonated with people concerned about children's exposure to polluted air in Delhi-NCR, where air quality often becomes a major concern during the winter months


Also Read: Maharashtra man steals 15 tolas of uncle’s gold to buy new Thar, arrested after inviting him to car's puja

One user responding to the post supported the parents' concerns, noting that children may be particularly vulnerable to air pollution because they breathe faster than adults and can inhale more fine particles relative to their body size.

The commenter also pointed out that installing an air purifier does not automatically guarantee effective protection. The device needs to be appropriately sized for the room, with a clean air delivery rate suitable for the space. Keeping doors and windows closed where appropriate can also help the purifier work more effectively.

The user further advised parents to seek medical attention if children develop persistent coughing, wheezing or rapid breathing on days when air quality is poor.

The discussion has brought renewed attention to the precautions families are considering as Delhi-NCR approaches another pollution season, as well as questions about the role schools should play in maintaining healthier classroom environments.

Disclaimer: This article is based on claims, statements, images, videos and other information shared by users on social media platforms. The ET.com has not independently verified the authenticity, accuracy or completeness of these claims unless expressly stated otherwise. The views, allegations and assertions contained in the social media content are those of the respective users and do not reflect the views of The ET.com. The publication bears no responsibility for the accuracy of such claims and readers are advised to exercise their own judgment and seek independent verification where necessary.